Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
vs
We compared two CPUs: the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600F. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K features 24 cores and 24 threads with a maximum clock speed of 5.7 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has 6 cores and 12 threads with a maximum clock speed of 4.4 GHz. Let's see which CPU performs better in terms of benchmarks and specifications.
Why Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is better than AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
- Geekbench 6 shows 65% faster single-core and 166% faster multi-core performance
- More advanced 3nm manufacturing process (vs 7nm)
- 30% higher CPU boost clock (5.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz)
- 300% more cores (24 cores vs 6 cores)
- 13% larger L3 cache (36 MB vs 32 MB)
- 102% higher memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 50.6 GB/s)
- Support for newer PCIe standard (PCIe 5.0 vs PCIe 4.0)
- Released about 3 years and 7 months later
Performance Scores
Single-Core Score
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
100
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
61
Multi-Core Score
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
100
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
31
Total Score
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
100
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
46
Geekbench 6
Single-Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +65%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
3,440
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
2,081
Multi-Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +166%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
23,472
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
8,839
| Single-Core | 3,440 | 2,081 |
| Multi-Core | 23,472 | 8,839 |
Cinebench R23
Single-Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +64%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2,370
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
1,449
Multi-Core
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K +297%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
41,988
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
10,573
| Single-Core | 2,370 | 1,449 |
| Multi-Core | 41,988 | 10,573 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600F
General Info
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Launch Date | Q4 2024 | April 2021 |
| Generation | 15th Gen Core Ultra | Ryzen 5000 Series |
| Codename | Arrow Lake-S | Vermeer |
| Type | Desktop Processor | Desktop Processor |
| Class | High-end | Mid-range |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Architecture | Lion Cove (P-cores) + Skymont (E-cores) | Zen 3 |
| Lithography | TSMC N3B (3nm) | 7 nm (TSMC) |
CPU
| Total Cores | 24 | 6 |
| Total Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Performance Cores | 8 | - |
| Performance Threads | 8 | - |
| Efficient Cores | 16 | - |
| Efficient Threads | 16 | - |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| P-Core Max Turbo Frequency | 5.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz | - |
| E-Core Max Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz | - |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 40 MB total (3 MB per P-core, 4 MB per 4 E-cores) | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB | 32 MB |
Memory
| Memory Type | DDR5-6400 | DDR4 |
| Max Memory Size | 192 GB | 128 GB |
| Max Bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 50.6 GB/s |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
GPU
| Integrated GPU | Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG) | Not Supported |
| GPU Base Frequency | 300 MHz | - |
| GPU Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | - |
| Max Resolution HDMI | 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1) | - |
| Max Resolution DP | 8K @ 60Hz (DP 2.1) | - |
| 4K Support | Yes | Yes |
Power & I/O
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| PCIe Version | PCIe 5.0 / 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 20 |
| Base TDP (PL1) | 125W | 120 W |
| Max Turbo Power (PL2) | 250 W | - |
| Max Temperature | 105°C | 95 °C |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |