Apple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G2
Across 12 measured categories, the Apple A16 Bionic comes out ahead.
I put the Apple A16 Bionic and the Google Tensor G2 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Apple A16 Bionic runs the Apple A16 GPU while the Google Tensor G2 runs the Mali-G710 MP7. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Apple A16 Bionic
8 advantages
-
30% higher AnTuTu score
16.28 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs
-
123% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,562 vs 2,942
-
91% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,686 vs 1,409
-
610 MHz higher CPU clock
3460 MHz vs 2850 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv8.6-A vs ARMv8.4-A
-
Larger L3 cache
24 MB vs 4 MB
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
4 nm vs 5 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
1.789 TFLOPS vs 759.8 GFLOPS
Google Tensor G2
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Apple A16 Bionic and the Google Tensor G2 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | September 2022 | October 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Apple | |
| Model Number | APL1W10 | GS201 |
| Total Cores | 6 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.46 GHz Everest Performance cores 4x 2.02 GHz Sawtooth Efficiency cores |
2x 2.85 GHz - Cortex X1 2x 2.35 GHz - Cortex A78 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3460 MHz | 2850 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.6-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 8 W | 7 W |
| GPU Name | Apple A16 GPU | Mali-G710 MP7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1398 MHz | 848 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 1.789 TFLOPS | 759.8 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | No | No |
| NPU | Neural Engine | Tensor Processing Unit |
| API Support | Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | NVMe | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 48 MP | 108 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 4K at 60FPS, 8K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 2796 x 1290 | 4K at 60Hz |
| Video Playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP8, VP9, ProRes, Motion JPEG | H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV, AIFF, CAF | AAC, MP3, WAV |
| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 | Exynos 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.5 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.5 Gbps | 1.25 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6E | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
Benchmark results
| Total | 16,28,011 | 12,50,149 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,40,612 | 4,48,605 |
| GPU | 3,34,126 | 2,81,299 |
| Memory | 2,11,032 | 2,04,601 |
| UX | 5,42,241 | 3,15,644 |
| Single-Core | 2,686 | 1,409 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,562 | 2,942 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Discussion