Google Tensor G4 vs Google Tensor G2
The Google Tensor G4 leads the Google Tensor G2 by 19% on AnTuTu v11 (14.85 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs) and is 37% faster in Geekbench single-core and 56% in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the Google Tensor G2.
Google Tensor G4 vs Google Tensor G2: key differences
Where the Google Tensor G4 leads
-
9% higher peak CPU clock
3.1 GHz vs 2.85 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.4-A
-
Smaller process node
4 nm vs 5 nm
-
2.2x more GPU compute power
1684.4 GFLOPS vs 759.8 GFLOPS
-
Newer RAM type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
33% faster RAM
4266 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
-
19% higher AnTuTu v11 score
14.85 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs
-
56% faster in Geekbench multi-core
4,581 vs 2,942
-
37% faster in Geekbench single-core
1,936 vs 1,409
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+19% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+37% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+56% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- August 2024
- October 2022
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Model Number
- GS401
- GS201
CPU
- Total Cores
- 8
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x Cortex X4 - 3.1GHz
3x Cortex A720 - 2.6GHz
4x Cortex A520 - 1.95GHz - 2x 2.85 GHz - Cortex X1
2x 2.35 GHz - Cortex A78
4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 - Max Frequency
- 3100 MHz
- 2850 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv8.4-A
- Process Node
- 4 nm
- 5 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- Samsung Foundry
- L2 Cache
- -
- 512 KB
- L3 Cache
- 4 MB
- 4 MB
- TDP
- 6 W
- 7 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- ARM Mali-G715 MP7
- Mali-G710 MP7
- GPU Frequency
- 940 MHz
- 848 MHz
- Shading Units
- 1344 shaders
- 448
- FLOPS
- 1684.4 GFLOPS
- 759.8 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- No
- No
- NPU
- Google Edge TPU
- Tensor Processing Unit
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5
- RAM Frequency
- 4266 MHz
- 3200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 68.26 GB/s
- 51.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 16 GB
- 16 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 3.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 200MP
- 108 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K at 60Hz
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
- AAC, MP3, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Samsung Exynos 5400
- Exynos 5300
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 14.79 Gbps
- 3.7 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 3.87 Gbps
- 1.25 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6E
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- 5.2
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 14,85,111
- 12,50,149
- CPU
- 5,20,100
- 4,48,605
- GPU
- 4,16,199
- 2,81,299
- Memory
- 2,32,401
- 2,04,601
- UX
- 3,16,411
- 3,15,644
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 1,936
- 1,409
- Multi-Core
- 4,581
- 2,942
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+16 pointsCPU Score
+14 pointsGPU Score
+20 pointsMemory Score
+16 pointsMore Tensor G4 and Tensor G2 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.