MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Google Tensor G2
Across 12 measured categories, the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 comes out ahead.
I put the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 and the Google Tensor G2 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 runs the Mali-G615 MP6 while the Google Tensor G2 runs the Mali-G710 MP7. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
10 advantages
-
31% higher AnTuTu score
16.42 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs
-
55% faster Geekbench multi-core score
4,566 vs 2,942
-
1% faster Geekbench single-core score
1,428 vs 1,409
-
500 MHz higher CPU clock
3350 MHz vs 2850 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9-A vs ARMv8.4-A
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
4 nm vs 5 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
2150.4 GFLOPS vs 759.8 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,066 MHz higher RAM speed
4266 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
Google Tensor G2
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 and the Google Tensor G2 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | November 2024 | October 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Upper Mid-range | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | |
| Model Number | MT6897 | GS201 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.35 GHz - Cortex-A715 3x 3.2 GHz - Cortex-A715 4x 2.2 GHz - Cortex-A510 |
2x 2.85 GHz - Cortex X1 2x 2.35 GHz - Cortex A78 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 2850 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | - | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 6 W | 7 W |
| GPU Name | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 848 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 759.8 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | MediaTek APU 780 | Tensor Processing Unit |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4266 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 68.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 320MP | 108 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | WQHD+ | 4K at 60Hz |
| Video Playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, MP3, WAV |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | Exynos 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.9 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.2 Gbps | 1.25 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6E | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | NAVIC, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 16,42,027 | 12,50,149 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 4,73,434 | 4,48,605 |
| GPU | 4,88,428 | 2,81,299 |
| Memory | 2,65,639 | 2,04,601 |
| UX | 4,13,526 | 3,15,644 |
| Single-Core | 1,428 | 1,409 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 4,566 | 2,942 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Discussion