Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Google Tensor G2
The Samsung Exynos 2500 leads the Google Tensor G2 by 72% on AnTuTu v11 (21.55 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs) and is 58% faster in Geekbench single-core and 2.5x in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the Google Tensor G2.
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Google Tensor G2: key differences
Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 leads
-
16% higher peak CPU clock
3.3 GHz vs 2.85 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.4-A
-
4x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
Smaller process node
3 nm vs 5 nm
-
5.4x more GPU compute power
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 759.8 GFLOPS
-
Newer RAM type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
50% faster RAM
4800 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
-
72% higher AnTuTu v11 score
21.55 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs
-
2.5x faster in Geekbench multi-core
7,361 vs 2,942
-
58% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,228 vs 1,409
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+72% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+58% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
2.5x fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- June 2025
- October 2022
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- Model Number
- S5E9955
- GS201
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - 2x 2.85 GHz - Cortex X1
2x 2.35 GHz - Cortex A78
4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 - Max Frequency
- 3300 MHz
- 2850 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv8.4-A
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 5 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- Samsung Foundry
- L2 Cache
- 11 MB
- 512 KB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 4 MB
- TDP
- 6 Watts
- 7 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- Mali-G710 MP7
- GPU Frequency
- 999 MHz
- 848 MHz
- Shading Units
- 64
- 448
- FLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- 759.8 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- No
- NPU
- -
- Tensor Processing Unit
- API Support
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 3200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 51.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 16 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 3.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320MP
- 108 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K at 60Hz
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS
- 4K at 60FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC, MP3, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5400 5G
- Exynos 5300
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 9.64 Gbps
- 3.7 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 2.55 Gbps
- 1.25 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6E
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 5.2
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 21,54,825
- 12,50,149
- CPU
- 5,14,532
- 4,48,605
- GPU
- 9,46,368
- 2,81,299
- Memory
- 3,83,044
- 2,04,601
- UX
- 3,10,881
- 3,15,644
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,228
- 1,409
- Multi-Core
- 7,361
- 2,942
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+29 pointsCPU Score
+31 pointsGPU Score
+37 pointsMemory Score
+21 pointsMore Exynos 2500 and Tensor G2 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.