Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A15 Bionic
Across 12 measured categories, the Samsung Exynos 2500 comes out ahead.
I put the Samsung Exynos 2500 and the Apple A15 Bionic side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Samsung Exynos 2500 runs the Samsung Xclipse 950 while the Apple A15 Bionic runs the Apple A15 GPU. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Samsung Exynos 2500
8 advantages
-
80% higher AnTuTu score
21.55 Lakhs vs 12.00 Lakhs
-
35% faster Geekbench multi-core score
7,361 vs 5,457
-
70 MHz higher CPU clock
3300 MHz vs 3230 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.5-A
-
2 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 5 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 1712 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
-
2,667 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 2133 MHz
Apple A15 Bionic
2 advantages
-
6% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,372 vs 2,228
-
Larger L3 cache
32 MB vs 16 MB
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Samsung Exynos 2500 and the Apple A15 Bionic compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | June 2025 | September 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Apple |
| Model Number | S5E9955 | APL1W07 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925 2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725 5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725 2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 |
2x 3.23 GHz Avalanche (Performance) 4x 2.02 GHz Blizzard (Efficiency) |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 3230 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.5-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 11 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 32 MB |
| TDP | 6 Watts | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 950 | Apple A15 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 999 MHz | 1338 MHz |
| Shading Units | 64 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 4091.9 GFLOPS | 1712 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | - | 16-core Apple Neural Engine |
| API Support | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 | Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | NVMe |
| Camera Support | 320MP | 12 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 2732 x 2048 |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS | 4K at 60 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG, ProRes |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, MP3, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Exynos 5400 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 9.64 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 2.55 Gbps | 3.0 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 21,54,825 | 12,00,314 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,14,532 | 2,88,667 |
| GPU | 9,46,368 | 3,95,574 |
| Memory | 3,83,044 | 1,41,170 |
| UX | 3,10,881 | 3,74,903 |
| Single-Core | 2,228 | 2,372 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 7,361 | 5,457 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Apple A15 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Discussion