Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Mediatek Dimensity 7400
The Samsung Exynos 2500 scores 2.2x higher than the Mediatek Dimensity 7400 on AnTuTu v11 (21.55 Lakhs vs 9.74 Lakhs) and is 2.1x faster in Geekbench single-core and 2.4x in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the Mediatek Dimensity 7400.
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Mediatek Dimensity 7400: key differences
Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 leads
-
27% higher peak CPU clock
3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.2-A
-
Smaller process node
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
6.2x more GPU compute power
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 655.5 GFLOPS
-
Newer RAM type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
50% faster RAM
4800 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS3.1, UFS2.2
-
2.2x higher AnTuTu v11 score
21.55 Lakhs vs 9.74 Lakhs
-
2.4x faster in Geekbench multi-core
7,361 vs 3,010
-
2.1x faster in Geekbench single-core
2,228 vs 1,077
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
2.2x fasterGeekbench Single-Core
2.1x fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
2.4x fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- June 2025
- February 2025
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Mid-range
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- MediaTek
- Model Number
- S5E9955
- MT6878
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - 4x 2.6GHz - Cortex A78
4x 2.0GHz - Cortex A55 - Max Frequency
- 3300 MHz
- 2600 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv8.2-A
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 4 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- TSMC N4P
- L2 Cache
- 11 MB
- 512 KB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- -
- TDP
- 6 Watts
- 4 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- Mali-G615 MC2
- GPU Frequency
- 999 MHz
- 1300 MHz
- Shading Units
- 64
- 128
- FLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- 655.5 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- No
- NPU
- -
- MediaTek NPU 655
- API Support
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 3200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 2x 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 25.6 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 16 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS3.1, UFS2.2
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320MP
- 200MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 30FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- Full HD+
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS
- 4K at 30FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP-9
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5400 5G
- MediaTek M80 5G
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 9.64 Gbps
- 3.27 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 2.55 Gbps
- -
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6E
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 5.4
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 21,54,825
- 9,74,042
- CPU
- 5,14,532
- 3,49,042
- GPU
- 9,46,368
- 1,46,939
- Memory
- 3,83,044
- 2,74,872
- UX
- 3,10,881
- 2,03,012
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,228
- 1,077
- Multi-Core
- 7,361
- 3,010
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+40 pointsCPU Score
+39 pointsGPU Score
+48 pointsMemory Score
+32 pointsMore Exynos 2500 and Mediatek Dimensity 7400 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.