Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Across 12 measured categories, the Samsung Exynos 2500 comes out ahead.
I put the Samsung Exynos 2500 and the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Samsung Exynos 2500 runs the Samsung Xclipse 950 while the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 runs the ARM Mali-G57 MP2. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Samsung Exynos 2500
11 advantages
-
268% higher AnTuTu score
21.55 Lakhs vs 5.86 Lakhs
-
279% faster Geekbench multi-core score
7,361 vs 1,943
-
209% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,228 vs 722
-
900 MHz higher CPU clock
3300 MHz vs 2400 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.2-A
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 2 MB
-
3 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 6 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 137.2 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
-
2,667 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 2133 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 2.2
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Samsung Exynos 2500 and the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | June 2025 | April 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Entry-level |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Model Number | S5E9955 | MT6835 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925 2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725 5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725 2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 |
2x 2.4 GHz- Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz- Cortex-A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 11 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
| TDP | 6 Watts | 8 W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 950 | ARM Mali-G57 MP2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 999 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Shading Units | 64 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 4091.9 GFLOPS | 137.2 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | - | MediaTek APU 3.0 |
| API Support | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 2x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 17 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Camera Support | 320MP | 108 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | Full HD+ |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1 | H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | Exynos 5400 5G | - |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 9.64 Gbps | 3.3 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 2.55 Gbps | 3.0 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 21,54,825 | 5,86,229 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,14,532 | 2,33,744 |
| GPU | 9,46,368 | 47,510 |
| Memory | 3,83,044 | 1,33,897 |
| UX | 3,10,881 | 1,71,078 |
| Single-Core | 2,228 | 722 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 7,361 | 1,943 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Samsung Exynos 2500 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
- 2 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 3 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
- 4 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
- 5 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 6 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
- 7 Google Tensor G5 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
- 9 Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
- 10 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Discussion