Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Apple A15 Bionic
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the Xiaomi Xring O1 and the Apple A15 Bionic side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Xiaomi Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 while the Apple A15 Bionic runs the Apple A15 GPU. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Xring O1
9 advantages
-
147% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 12.00 Lakhs
-
67% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 5,457
-
12% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,660 vs 2,372
-
670 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 3230 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.5-A
-
2 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 5 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 1712 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
-
2,667 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 2133 MHz
Apple A15 Bionic
1 advantage
-
Larger L3 cache
32 MB vs 16 MB
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Xring O1 and the Apple A15 Bionic compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | May 2025 | September 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Xiaomi | Apple |
| Model Number | - | APL1W07 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
2x 3.23 GHz Avalanche (Performance) 4x 2.02 GHz Blizzard (Efficiency) |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 3230 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.5-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 32 MB |
| TDP | - | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Apple A15 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 1338 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 1712 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | 44 TOPS | 16-core Apple Neural Engine |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | NVMe |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 12 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 2732 x 2048 |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG, ProRes |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, MP3, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.90 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.20 Gbps | 3.0 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou |
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,63,052 | 12,00,314 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,37,172 | 2,88,667 |
| GPU | 9,96,086 | 3,95,574 |
| Memory | 4,09,648 | 1,41,170 |
| UX | 6,20,146 | 3,74,903 |
| Single-Core | 2,660 | 2,372 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 9,111 | 5,457 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Xring O1 | Apple A15 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
- 2 Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
- 3 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Google Tensor
- 4 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
- 5 Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
- 6 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 7 Apple A15 Bionic vs Apple A16 Bionic
- 8 Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 9 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 10 Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Discussion