Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Google Tensor
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the Xring O1 and the Google Tensor side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 while the Google Tensor runs the Mali-G78 MP20. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Xring O1
11 advantages
-
200% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 9.87 Lakhs
-
177% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 3,294
-
92% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,660 vs 1,384
-
1,100 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 2800 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.2-A
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
2 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 5 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 1085 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,600 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
Google Tensor
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Xring O1 and the Google Tensor compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | May 2025 | October 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Xiaomi | |
| Model Number | - | GS101 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
2x 2.8 GHz - Cortex X1 2x 2.25 GHz - Cortex A76 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | - | 5.6 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 640 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 1085 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | 44 TOPS | Edge TPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, Open CL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 200 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G | Exynos 5300b 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.90 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.20 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,63,052 | 9,87,312 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,37,172 | 3,88,463 |
| GPU | 9,96,086 | 1,86,800 |
| Memory | 4,09,648 | 1,64,486 |
| UX | 6,20,146 | 2,47,563 |
| Single-Core | 2,660 | 1,384 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 9,111 | 3,294 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Xring O1 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 2 Xring O1 vs Google Tensor G2
- 3 Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 4 Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
- 5 Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 6 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Google Tensor
- 7 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Google Tensor
- 8 Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor
- 9 Apple A17 Pro vs Google Tensor
- 10 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Google Tensor
Discussion