Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor
Across 12 measured categories, the Exynos 2600 comes out ahead.
I put the Exynos 2600 and the Google Tensor side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Exynos 2600 runs the Samsung Xclipse 960 while the Google Tensor runs the Mali-G78 MP20. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Exynos 2600
11 advantages
-
197% higher AnTuTu score
29.29 Lakhs vs 9.87 Lakhs
-
209% faster Geekbench multi-core score
10,192 vs 3,294
-
105% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,843 vs 1,384
-
1,000 MHz higher CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 2800 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv8.2-A
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
3 nm smaller semiconductor size
2 nm vs 5 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 1085 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,000 MHz higher RAM speed
4200 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
Google Tensor
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Exynos 2600 and the Google Tensor compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | December 2025 | October 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | |
| Model Number | Exynos 2600 | GS101 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro 6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro |
2x 2.8 GHz - Cortex X1 2x 2.25 GHz - Cortex A76 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2800 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.3 | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process Node | 2 nm | 5 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | - | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | - | 5.6 W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 985 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 640 |
| FLOPS | 7024.6 GFLOPS | 1085 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | 32K MAC NPU | Edge TPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, Open CL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 200 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K at 120Hz | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Exynos 5410 | Exynos 5300b 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 14.79 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.90 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,29,281 | 9,87,312 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,56,605 | 3,88,463 |
| GPU | 10,97,739 | 1,86,800 |
| Memory | 4,24,610 | 1,64,486 |
| UX | 4,50,327 | 2,47,563 |
| Single-Core | 2,843 | 1,384 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 10,192 | 3,294 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
- 2 Exynos 2600 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 3 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
- 4 Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G2
- 5 Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- 6 Apple A17 Pro vs Google Tensor
- 7 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Google Tensor
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Google Tensor
- 9 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Google Tensor
- 10 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor
Discussion