Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor
The Exynos 2600 scores 3x higher than the Google Tensor on AnTuTu v11 (29.29 Lakhs vs 9.87 Lakhs) and is 2.1x faster in Geekbench single-core and 3.1x in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the Google Tensor.
Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor: key differences
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
36% higher peak CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv8.2-A
-
4x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 5 nm
-
6.5x more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 1085 GFLOPS
-
Newer RAM type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
31% faster RAM
4200 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
-
3x higher AnTuTu v11 score
29.29 Lakhs vs 9.87 Lakhs
-
3.1x faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 3,294
-
2.1x faster in Geekbench single-core
2,843 vs 1,384
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
3x fasterGeekbench Single-Core
2.1x fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
3.1x fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- December 2025
- October 2021
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- Model Number
- Exynos 2600
- GS101
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - 2x 2.8 GHz - Cortex X1
2x 2.25 GHz - Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 - Max Frequency
- 3.8 GHz
- 2800 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.3
- ARMv8.2-A
- Process Node
- 2 nm
- 5 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- Samsung Foundry
- L2 Cache
- -
- 3 MB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 4 MB
- TDP
- -
- 5.6 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- Mali-G78 MP20
- GPU Frequency
- 985 MHz
- 850 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 640
- FLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- 1085 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- No
- NPU
- 32K MAC NPU
- Edge TPU
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
- Vulkan 1.3, Open CL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5
- RAM Frequency
- 4200 MHz
- 3200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 67.2 GB/s
- 51.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 12 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.1
- UFS 3.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 200 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K at 120Hz
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5410
- Exynos 5300b 5G
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 14.79 Gbps
- 7.35 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.90 Gbps
- 3.67 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6
- Bluetooth
- 6.1
- 5.2
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 29,29,281
- 9,87,312
- CPU
- 9,56,605
- 3,88,463
- GPU
- 10,97,739
- 1,86,800
- Memory
- 4,24,610
- 1,64,486
- UX
- 4,50,327
- 2,47,563
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,843
- 1,384
- Multi-Core
- 10,192
- 3,294
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+38 pointsCPU Score
+40 pointsGPU Score
+51 pointsMemory Score
+22 pointsMore Exynos 2600 and Google Tensor comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.