Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G2
The Exynos 2600 scores 2.3x higher than the Google Tensor G2 on AnTuTu v11 (29.29 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs) and is 2x faster in Geekbench single-core and 3.5x in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the Google Tensor G2.
Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G2: key differences
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
33% higher peak CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 2.85 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv8.4-A
-
4x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 5 nm
-
9.2x more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 759.8 GFLOPS
-
Newer RAM type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
31% faster RAM
4200 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
-
2.3x higher AnTuTu v11 score
29.29 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs
-
3.5x faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 2,942
-
2x faster in Geekbench single-core
2,843 vs 1,409
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
2.3x fasterGeekbench Single-Core
2x fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
3.5x fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- December 2025
- October 2022
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- Model Number
- Exynos 2600
- GS201
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - 2x 2.85 GHz - Cortex X1
2x 2.35 GHz - Cortex A78
4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 - Max Frequency
- 3.8 GHz
- 2850 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.3
- ARMv8.4-A
- Process Node
- 2 nm
- 5 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- Samsung Foundry
- L2 Cache
- -
- 512 KB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 4 MB
- TDP
- -
- 7 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- Mali-G710 MP7
- GPU Frequency
- 985 MHz
- 848 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 448
- FLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- 759.8 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- No
- NPU
- 32K MAC NPU
- Tensor Processing Unit
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5
- RAM Frequency
- 4200 MHz
- 3200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 67.2 GB/s
- 51.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 16 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.1
- UFS 3.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 108 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K at 120Hz
- 4K at 60Hz
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC, MP3, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5410
- Exynos 5300
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 14.79 Gbps
- 3.7 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.90 Gbps
- 1.25 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6E
- Bluetooth
- 6.1
- 5.2
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 29,29,281
- 12,50,149
- CPU
- 9,56,605
- 4,48,605
- GPU
- 10,97,739
- 2,81,299
- Memory
- 4,24,610
- 2,04,601
- UX
- 4,50,327
- 3,15,644
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,843
- 1,409
- Multi-Core
- 10,192
- 2,942
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+37 pointsCPU Score
+39 pointsGPU Score
+51 pointsMemory Score
+22 pointsMore Exynos 2600 and Tensor G2 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.