Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G2
Across 12 measured categories, the Exynos 2600 comes out ahead.
I put the Exynos 2600 and the Google Tensor G2 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Exynos 2600 runs the Samsung Xclipse 960 while the Google Tensor G2 runs the Mali-G710 MP7. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Exynos 2600
11 advantages
-
134% higher AnTuTu score
29.29 Lakhs vs 12.50 Lakhs
-
246% faster Geekbench multi-core score
10,192 vs 2,942
-
102% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,843 vs 1,409
-
950 MHz higher CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 2850 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv8.4-A
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
3 nm smaller semiconductor size
2 nm vs 5 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 759.8 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,000 MHz higher RAM speed
4200 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
Google Tensor G2
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Exynos 2600 and the Google Tensor G2 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | December 2025 | October 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | |
| Model Number | Exynos 2600 | GS201 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro 6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro |
2x 2.85 GHz - Cortex X1 2x 2.35 GHz - Cortex A78 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2850 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.3 | ARMv8.4-A |
| Process Node | 2 nm | 5 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | - | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | - | 7 W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 985 MHz | 848 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 7024.6 GFLOPS | 759.8 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | 32K MAC NPU | Tensor Processing Unit |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 108 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K at 120Hz | 4K at 60Hz |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, MP3, WAV |
| Modem | Exynos 5410 | Exynos 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 14.79 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.90 Gbps | 1.25 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,29,281 | 12,50,149 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,56,605 | 4,48,605 |
| GPU | 10,97,739 | 2,81,299 |
| Memory | 4,24,610 | 2,04,601 |
| UX | 4,50,327 | 3,15,644 |
| Single-Core | 2,843 | 1,409 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 10,192 | 2,942 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Exynos 2600
- 2 Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 3 Exynos 2600 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 4 Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor
- 5 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
- 6 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G2
- 7 Apple A19 Pro vs Google Tensor G2
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Google Tensor G2
- 9 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Google Tensor G2
- 10 Xring O1 vs Google Tensor G2
Discussion