Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
The Exynos 2600 leads the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 by 98% on AnTuTu v11 (29.29 Lakhs vs 14.82 Lakhs) and is 2.7x faster in Geekbench single-core and 2.8x in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the MediaTek Dimensity 9000.
Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000: key differences
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
25% higher peak CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 3.05 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9-A
-
2x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 8 MB
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 4 nm
-
6.5x more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 1085.5 GFLOPS
-
12% faster RAM
4200 MHz vs 3750 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
-
98% higher AnTuTu v11 score
29.29 Lakhs vs 14.82 Lakhs
-
2.8x faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 3,582
-
2.7x faster in Geekbench single-core
2,843 vs 1,065
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+98% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
2.7x fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
2.8x fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- December 2025
- November 2021
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- MediaTek
- Model Number
- Exynos 2600
- MT6983
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - 1x 3.05 GHz Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 - Max Frequency
- 3.8 GHz
- 3050 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.3
- ARMv9-A
- Process Node
- 2 nm
- 4 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- TSMC
- L2 Cache
- -
- 1 MB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 8 MB
- TDP
- -
- 4 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- ARM Mali-G710 MC10
- GPU Frequency
- 985 MHz
- 848 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 64
- FLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- 1085.5 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- No
- NPU
- 32K MAC NPU
- MediaTek APU 590
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4200 MHz
- 3750 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x 16 Bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 67.2 GB/s
- 60 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.1
- UFS 3.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K at 120Hz
- WQHD+
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60 FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC, FLAC, MP3, OGG, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5410
- MediaTek M80 5G
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 14.79 Gbps
- 7.0 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.90 Gbps
- 2.5 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6E
- Bluetooth
- 6.1
- 5.3
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, BeiDou, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 29,29,281
- 14,82,293
- CPU
- 9,56,605
- 5,66,147
- GPU
- 10,97,739
- 2,88,636
- Memory
- 4,24,610
- 2,03,966
- UX
- 4,50,327
- 4,23,544
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,843
- 1,065
- Multi-Core
- 10,192
- 3,582
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+26 pointsCPU Score
+28 pointsGPU Score
+39 pointsMemory Score
+11 pointsMore Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9000 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.