Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Across 12 measured categories, the Samsung Exynos 2400 comes out ahead.
I put the Samsung Exynos 2400 and the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Samsung Exynos 2400 runs the Samsung Xclipse 940 while the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 runs the ARM Mali-G710 MC10. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Samsung Exynos 2400
8 advantages
-
36% higher AnTuTu score
20.18 Lakhs vs 14.82 Lakhs
-
89% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,785 vs 3,582
-
94% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,067 vs 1,065
-
160 MHz higher CPU clock
3210 MHz vs 3050 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
3407 GFLOPS vs 1085.5 GFLOPS
-
450 MHz higher RAM speed
4200 MHz vs 3750 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Samsung Exynos 2400 and the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | January 2024 | November 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Model Number | S5E9945 | MT6983 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
1x 3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 3x 2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max Frequency | 3210 MHz | 3050 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung Foundry | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | 6 W | 4 W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 940 | ARM Mali-G710 MC10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1009 MHz | 848 MHz |
| Shading Units | 768 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 3407 GFLOPS | 1085.5 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | Exynos AI Engine | MediaTek APU 590 |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4200 MHz | 3750 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4 × 16-bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 60 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | WQHD+ |
| Video Playback | 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS | 4K at 60 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1 | H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, FLAC, MP3, OGG, WAV |
| Modem | Exynos 5300 Modem | MediaTek M80 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 12.1 Gbps | 7.0 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.67 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6E | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, BeiDou, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 20,17,639 | 14,82,293 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 69,80,818 | 5,66,147 |
| GPU | 6,16,764 | 2,88,636 |
| Memory | 3,05,547 | 2,03,966 |
| UX | 4,04,510 | 4,23,544 |
| Single-Core | 2,067 | 1,065 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,785 | 3,582 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Samsung Exynos 2400 | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 2 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G4
- 3 Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 4 Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 5 Apple A18 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 6 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 7 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 8 Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 9 Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
Discussion