Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Across 12 measured categories, the Samsung Exynos 2400 comes out ahead.
I put the Samsung Exynos 2400 and the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Samsung Exynos 2400 runs the Samsung Xclipse 940 while the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 runs the Mali-G615 MP6. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Samsung Exynos 2400
6 advantages
-
23% higher AnTuTu score
20.18 Lakhs vs 16.42 Lakhs
-
49% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,785 vs 4,566
-
45% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,067 vs 1,428
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
Larger L3 cache
8 MB vs 4 MB
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
3407 GFLOPS vs 2150.4 GFLOPS
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
2 advantages
-
140 MHz higher CPU clock
3350 MHz vs 3210 MHz
-
66 MHz higher RAM speed
4266 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Samsung Exynos 2400 and the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | January 2024 | November 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Upper Mid-range |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Model Number | S5E9945 | MT6897 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
1x 3.35 GHz - Cortex-A715 3x 3.2 GHz - Cortex-A715 4x 2.2 GHz - Cortex-A510 |
| Max Frequency | 3210 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung Foundry | TSMC |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 6 W | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1009 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Shading Units | 768 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 3407 GFLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | Exynos AI Engine | MediaTek APU 780 |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4 × 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 68.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | WQHD+ |
| Video Playback | 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | Exynos 5300 Modem | MediaTek T800 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 12.1 Gbps | 7.9 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.67 Gbps | 4.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6E | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | NAVIC, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 20,17,639 | 16,42,027 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 69,80,818 | 4,73,434 |
| GPU | 6,16,764 | 4,88,428 |
| Memory | 3,05,547 | 2,65,639 |
| UX | 4,04,510 | 4,13,526 |
| Single-Core | 2,067 | 1,428 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,785 | 4,566 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Samsung Exynos 2400 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 2 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
- 3 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor
- 4 Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 5 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 6 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Exynos 2600
- 7 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
- 8 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
- 9 Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
- 10 Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
Discussion