Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Across 12 measured categories, the Google Tensor G5 comes out ahead.
I put the Google Tensor G5 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Google Tensor G5 runs the PowerVR DXT-48-1536 while the Samsung Exynos 2400 runs the Samsung Xclipse 940. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Google Tensor G5
4 advantages
-
11% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,298 vs 2,067
-
570 MHz higher CPU clock
3780 MHz vs 3210 MHz
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
1,133 MHz higher RAM speed
5333 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400
3 advantages
-
52% higher AnTuTu score
20.18 Lakhs vs 13.27 Lakhs
-
8% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,785 vs 6,301
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
3407 GFLOPS vs 1689.6 GFLOPS
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Google Tensor G5 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | August 2025 | January 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | |
| Model Number | GS501 | S5E9945 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x Cortex X4 - 3.78GHz 5x Cortex A725 - 3.05GHz 2x Cortex A520 - 2.25GHz |
1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3780 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | 6 W | 6 W |
| GPU Name | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1009 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 1689.6 GFLOPS | 3407 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | No | Yes |
| NPU | - | Exynos AI Engine |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 5333 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4 × 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 68.2 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 200MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | WQHD+ | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP9 | H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Samsung Exynos 5400 5G | Exynos 5300 Modem |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 14.79 Gbps | 12.1 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.5 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 13,26,623 | 20,17,639 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 4,63,275 | 69,80,818 |
| GPU | 4,11,537 | 6,16,764 |
| Memory | 2,33,612 | 3,05,547 |
| UX | 2,12,199 | 4,04,510 |
| Single-Core | 2,298 | 2,067 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,301 | 6,785 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G5
- 2 Google Tensor G5 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite
- 3 Google Tensor G5 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 4 Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 5 Apple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G5
- 6 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 7 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G4
- 8 Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 9 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 10 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Discussion