Exynos 2600 vs Apple A15 Bionic
In Geekbench, the Exynos 2600 is 20% faster in single-core and 87% faster in multi-core. Where the Apple A15 Bionic does better: 2x larger L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Exynos 2600 vs Apple A15 Bionic: key differences
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
18% higher peak CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 3.23 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv8.5-A
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 5 nm
-
4.1x more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 1712 GFLOPS
-
Newer RAM type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR4X
-
97% faster RAM
4200 MHz vs 2133 MHz
-
87% faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 5,457
-
20% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,843 vs 2,372
Where the Apple A15 Bionic leads
-
2x larger L3 cache
32 MB vs 16 MB
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
AnTuTu scores from iOS and Android are not directly comparable, so no winner is marked.
Geekbench Single-Core
+20% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+87% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- December 2025
- September 2021
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- Apple
- Model Number
- Exynos 2600
- APL1W07
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 6
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - 2x 3.23 GHz Avalanche (Performance)
4x 2.02 GHz Blizzard (Efficiency) - Max Frequency
- 3.8 GHz
- 3230 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.3
- ARMv8.5-A
- Process Node
- 2 nm
- 5 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- TSMC
- L2 Cache
- -
- 12 MB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 32 MB
- TDP
- -
- 6 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- Apple A15 GPU
- GPU Frequency
- 985 MHz
- 1338 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 128
- FLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- 1712 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- No
- NPU
- 32K MAC NPU
- 16-core Apple Neural Engine
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
- Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR4X
- RAM Frequency
- 4200 MHz
- 2133 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x 16 Bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 67.2 GB/s
- 34.1 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 6 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.1
- NVMe
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 12 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60 FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K at 120Hz
- 2732 x 2048
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 60 FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG, ProRes
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC, MP3, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5410
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X60
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 14.79 Gbps
- 7.5 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.90 Gbps
- 3.0 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6
- Bluetooth
- 6.1
- 5.0
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
AnTuTu scores from iOS and Android are not directly comparable, so no winner is marked.
- Total
- 29,29,281
- 12,00,314
- CPU
- 9,56,605
- 2,88,667
- GPU
- 10,97,739
- 3,95,574
- Memory
- 4,24,610
- 1,41,170
- UX
- 4,50,327
- 3,74,903
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,843
- 2,372
- Multi-Core
- 10,192
- 5,457
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+48 pointsCPU Score
+29 pointsGPU Score
+34 pointsMemory Score
+38 pointsMore Exynos 2600 and Apple A15 Bionic comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.