Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Across 12 measured categories, the Exynos 2600 comes out ahead.
I put the Exynos 2600 and the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Exynos 2600 runs the Samsung Xclipse 960 while the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 runs the IMG BXM-8-256. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Exynos 2600
11 advantages
-
367% higher AnTuTu score
29.29 Lakhs vs 6.27 Lakhs
-
373% faster Geekbench multi-core score
10,192 vs 2,156
-
195% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,843 vs 964
-
1,300 MHz higher CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 2500 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv8.2-A
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
4 nm smaller semiconductor size
2 nm vs 6 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 243.2 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,000 MHz higher RAM speed
4200 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Exynos 2600 and the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | December 2025 | April 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Model Number | Exynos 2600 | MT6855 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro 6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro |
2× 2.5 GHz - Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2500 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.3 | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process Node | 2 nm | 6 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | - | 5W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 960 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 985 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 18 |
| FLOPS | 7024.6 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | 32K MAC NPU | MediaTek NPU 550 |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 2× 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 200 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K at 120Hz | Full HD+ |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Exynos 5410 | - |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 14.79 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.90 Gbps | 1.25 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,29,281 | 6,26,826 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,56,605 | 2,57,876 |
| GPU | 10,97,739 | 59,950 |
| Memory | 4,24,610 | 1,22,690 |
| UX | 4,50,327 | 1,86,310 |
| Single-Core | 2,843 | 964 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 10,192 | 2,156 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Exynos 2600 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 2 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
- 3 Exynos 2600 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 4 Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor
- 5 Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
- 6 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 7 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 9 Apple A18 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 10 Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Discussion