Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the Xring O1 and the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 while the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 runs the Adreno 810. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Xring O1
10 advantages
-
161% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 11.35 Lakhs
-
162% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 3,481
-
114% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,660 vs 1,243
-
1,200 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 2700 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 458.2 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,600 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 3.1
Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Xring O1 and the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | May 2025 | August 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Manufacturer | Xiaomi | Qualcomm |
| Model Number | - | SM7635-AC |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
1x 2.7GHz - Cortex A720 3x 2.4GHz - Cortex A720 4x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | - |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Adreno 810 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | 44 TOPS | Hexagon NPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 2x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 200MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | WQHD+ |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G | Snapdragon X62 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.90 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.20 Gbps | 1.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,63,052 | 11,35,457 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,37,172 | 4,15,619 |
| GPU | 9,96,086 | 1,97,127 |
| Memory | 4,09,648 | 2,33,571 |
| UX | 6,20,146 | 2,89,140 |
| Single-Core | 2,660 | 1,243 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 9,111 | 3,481 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Xring O1 | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
- 2 Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
- 3 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Google Tensor
- 4 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 5 Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
- 6 Apple A16 Bionic vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 7 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 9 Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 10 Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Apple A17 Pro
Discussion