Google Tensor G5 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Across 12 measured categories, the Google Tensor G5 comes out ahead.
I put the Google Tensor G5 and the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Google Tensor G5 runs the PowerVR DXT-48-1536 while the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 runs the Adreno 810. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Google Tensor G5
10 advantages
-
17% higher AnTuTu score
13.27 Lakhs vs 11.35 Lakhs
-
81% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,301 vs 3,481
-
85% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,298 vs 1,243
-
1,080 MHz higher CPU clock
3780 MHz vs 2700 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
1689.6 GFLOPS vs 458.2 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
2,133 MHz higher RAM speed
5333 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Google Tensor G5 and the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | August 2025 | August 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm | |
| Model Number | GS501 | SM7635-AC |
| Total Cores | 8 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x Cortex X4 - 3.78GHz 5x Cortex A725 - 3.05GHz 2x Cortex A520 - 2.25GHz |
1x 2.7GHz - Cortex A720 3x 2.4GHz - Cortex A720 4x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3780 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | - |
| TDP | 6 W | - |
| GPU Name | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Adreno 810 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 1689.6 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | No | No |
| NPU | - | Hexagon NPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 5333 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 2x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 68.2 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 200MP | 200MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | WQHD+ | WQHD+ |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive |
| Modem | Samsung Exynos 5400 5G | Snapdragon X62 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 14.79 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.5 Gbps | 1.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 13,26,623 | 11,35,457 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 4,63,275 | 4,15,619 |
| GPU | 4,11,537 | 1,97,127 |
| Memory | 2,33,612 | 2,33,571 |
| UX | 2,12,199 | 2,89,140 |
| Single-Core | 2,298 | 1,243 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,301 | 3,481 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Google Tensor G5 | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Google Tensor G5
- 2 Google Tensor G2 vs Google Tensor G5
- 3 Google Tensor G5 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 4 Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Google Tensor G5
- 5 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Google Tensor G5
- 6 Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 7 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 8 Apple A16 Bionic vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
- 9 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Discussion