Google Tensor vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
The MediaTek Dimensity 9000 leads the Google Tensor by 50% on AnTuTu v11 (14.82 Lakhs vs 9.87 Lakhs). Geekbench is split: the Google Tensor is 30% faster in single-core, while the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 9% faster in multi-core.
Google Tensor vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000: key differences
Where the Google Tensor leads
-
30% faster in Geekbench single-core
1,384 vs 1,065
Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 leads
-
9% higher peak CPU clock
3.05 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9-A vs ARMv8.2-A
-
2x larger L3 cache
8 MB vs 4 MB
-
Smaller process node
4 nm vs 5 nm
-
0% more GPU compute power
1085.5 GFLOPS vs 1085 GFLOPS
-
Newer RAM type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
17% faster RAM
3750 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
50% higher AnTuTu v11 score
14.82 Lakhs vs 9.87 Lakhs
-
9% faster in Geekbench multi-core
3,582 vs 3,294
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+50% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+30% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+9% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- October 2021
- November 2021
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- MediaTek
- Model Number
- GS101
- MT6983
CPU
- Total Cores
- 8
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 2x 2.8 GHz - Cortex X1
2x 2.25 GHz - Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 - 1x 3.05 GHz Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 - Max Frequency
- 2800 MHz
- 3050 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv8.2-A
- ARMv9-A
- Process Node
- 5 nm
- 4 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung Foundry
- TSMC
- L2 Cache
- 3 MB
- 1 MB
- L3 Cache
- 4 MB
- 8 MB
- TDP
- 5.6 W
- 4 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Mali-G78 MP20
- ARM Mali-G710 MC10
- GPU Frequency
- 850 MHz
- 848 MHz
- Shading Units
- 640
- 64
- FLOPS
- 1085 GFLOPS
- 1085.5 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- No
- No
- NPU
- Edge TPU
- MediaTek APU 590
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.3, Open CL 2.0
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 3200 MHz
- 3750 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x16-bit
- 4x 16 Bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 51.2 GB/s
- 60 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 12 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 3.1
- UFS 3.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 200 MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS
- 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- WQHD+
- Video Playback
- 4K at 60FPS
- 4K at 60 FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1
- H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
- AAC, FLAC, MP3, OGG, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5300b 5G
- MediaTek M80 5G
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 7.35 Gbps
- 7.0 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 3.67 Gbps
- 2.5 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 6
- 6E
- Bluetooth
- 5.2
- 5.3
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, BeiDou, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 9,87,312
- 14,82,293
- CPU
- 3,88,463
- 5,66,147
- GPU
- 1,86,800
- 2,88,636
- Memory
- 1,64,486
- 2,03,966
- UX
- 2,47,563
- 4,23,544
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 1,384
- 1,065
- Multi-Core
- 3,294
- 3,582
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+12 pointsCPU Score
+12 pointsGPU Score
+12 pointsMemory Score
+11 pointsMore Google Tensor and Dimensity 9000 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.