Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the Xring O1 and the MediaTek Dimensity 8450 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 while the MediaTek Dimensity 8450 runs the Mali-G720 MP7. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Xring O1
9 advantages
-
47% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 20.17 Lakhs
-
47% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 6,217
-
66% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,660 vs 1,598
-
650 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 3250 MHz
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 6 MB
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 2329 GFLOPS
-
534 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
MediaTek Dimensity 8450
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Xring O1 and the MediaTek Dimensity 8450 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | May 2025 | MT6899 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Upper Mid-range |
| Manufacturer | Xiaomi | MediaTek |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
1x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-A725 3x 3.0 GHz - Cortex-A725 4x 2.1 GHz - Cortex-A725 |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB |
| TDP | - | 7 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 2329 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | 44 TOPS | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 68.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | WQHD+ |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G | - |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.90 Gbps | 5.17 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.20 Gbps | 2.30 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,63,052 | 20,16,572 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,37,172 | 6,56,057 |
| GPU | 9,96,086 | 6,41,057 |
| Memory | 4,09,648 | 2,56,365 |
| UX | 6,20,146 | 4,62,908 |
| Single-Core | 2,660 | 1,598 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 9,111 | 6,217 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Xring O1 | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 2 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500
- 3 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Xring O1
- 4 Xring O1 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 5 Xring O1 vs Google Tensor G4
- 6 Apple A18 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 7 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 8 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 9 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 10 Apple A17 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Discussion