Apple A15 Bionic vs Google Tensor
Across 12 measured categories, the Apple A15 Bionic comes out ahead.
I put the Apple A15 Bionic and the Google Tensor side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Apple A15 Bionic runs the Apple A15 GPU while the Google Tensor runs the Mali-G78 MP20. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Apple A15 Bionic
7 advantages
-
22% higher AnTuTu score
12.00 Lakhs vs 9.87 Lakhs
-
66% faster Geekbench multi-core score
5,457 vs 3,294
-
71% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,372 vs 1,384
-
430 MHz higher CPU clock
3230 MHz vs 2800 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv8.5-A vs ARMv8.2-A
-
Larger L3 cache
32 MB vs 4 MB
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
1712 GFLOPS vs 1085 GFLOPS
Google Tensor
2 advantages
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5 vs LPDDR4X
-
1,067 MHz higher RAM speed
3200 MHz vs 2133 MHz
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Apple A15 Bionic and the Google Tensor compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | September 2021 | October 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Apple | |
| Model Number | APL1W07 | GS101 |
| Total Cores | 6 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.23 GHz Avalanche (Performance) 4x 2.02 GHz Blizzard (Efficiency) |
2x 2.8 GHz - Cortex X1 2x 2.25 GHz - Cortex A76 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3230 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.5-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 6 W | 5.6 W |
| GPU Name | Apple A15 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1338 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 640 |
| FLOPS | 1712 GFLOPS | 1085 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | No | No |
| NPU | 16-core Apple Neural Engine | Edge TPU |
| API Support | Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0 | Vulkan 1.3, Open CL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage Type | NVMe | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 12 MP | 200 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 4K at 60 FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 2732 x 2048 | 4K |
| Video Playback | 4K at 60 FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG, ProRes | H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, MP3, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 | Exynos 5300b 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.5 Gbps | 7.35 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.0 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
Benchmark results
| Total | 12,00,314 | 9,87,312 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 2,88,667 | 3,88,463 |
| GPU | 3,95,574 | 1,86,800 |
| Memory | 1,41,170 | 1,64,486 |
| UX | 3,74,903 | 2,47,563 |
| Single-Core | 2,372 | 1,384 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 5,457 | 3,294 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Apple A15 Bionic | Google Tensor |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Apple A15 Bionic vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
- 2 Apple A15 Bionic vs Google Tensor G2
- 3 Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
- 4 Apple A15 Bionic vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
- 5 Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060
- 6 MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Google Tensor
- 7 Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Google Tensor
- 8 Google Tensor G2 vs Google Tensor
- 9 MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Google Tensor
- 10 Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Google Tensor
Discussion