MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Across 12 measured categories, the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 comes out ahead.
I put the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 and the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 runs the Arm Mali-G720 MC8 while the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 runs the Mali-G720 MP7 GPU. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
MediaTek Dimensity 8500
6 advantages
-
22% higher AnTuTu score
24.08 Lakhs vs 19.78 Lakhs
-
9% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,762 vs 6,179
-
8% faster Geekbench single-core score
1,728 vs 1,595
-
150 MHz higher CPU clock
3400 MHz vs 3250 MHz
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
2662.4 GFLOPS vs 2300 GFLOPS
-
534 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 and the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | January 2026 | December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Upper Mid-range | Upper Mid-range |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Model Number | MT6899 | MT6899 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 3x 3.20 GHz - Cortex-A725 4x 2.20 GHz - Cortex-A725 |
1x 3.25GHz - Cortex-A725 3x 3.0GHz - Cortex-A725 4x 2.1GHz - Cortex-A725 |
| Max Frequency | 3400 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 4nm | 4nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | - | 1MB |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 6MB |
| TDP | - | 7 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Mali-G720 MC8 | Mali-G720 MP7 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 2662.4 GFLOPS | 2300 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| API Support | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 68.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320MP | 320MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K @ 60FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | WQHD+ | WQHD+ |
| Video Playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | - | - |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 5.17 Gbps | 5.17 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 1.25 Gbps | 1.28 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6E | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 24,07,614 | 19,77,584 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 7,09,591 | 6,20,628 |
| GPU | 7,62,021 | 6,40,290 |
| Memory | 4,09,017 | 2,82,939 |
| UX | 5,26,985 | 4,33,737 |
| Single-Core | 1,728 | 1,595 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,762 | 6,179 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Apple A18 Pro
- 2 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Google Tensor G4
- 3 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500
- 4 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 5 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500
- 6 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 7 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 9 Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 10 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Xring O1
Discussion