MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Xring O1
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 and the Xring O1 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 runs the Mali-G720 MP7 GPU while the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Xring O1
9 advantages
-
50% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 19.78 Lakhs
-
47% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 6,179
-
67% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,660 vs 1,595
-
650 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 3250 MHz
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 6MB
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 2300 GFLOPS
-
534 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 and the Xring O1 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | December 2024 | May 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Upper Mid-range | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | Xiaomi |
| Model Number | MT6899 | - |
| Total Cores | 8 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.25GHz - Cortex-A725 3x 3.0GHz - Cortex-A725 4x 2.1GHz - Cortex-A725 |
2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 3900 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 4nm | 3 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 1MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 6MB | 16 MB |
| TDP | 7 W | - |
| GPU Name | Mali-G720 MP7 GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 2300 GFLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | 44 TOPS |
| API Support | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4266 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 68.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Camera Support | 320MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 4K @ 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | WQHD+ | 4K |
| Video Playback | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | - | MediaTek T800 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 5.17 Gbps | 7.90 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 1.28 Gbps | 4.20 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6E | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 19,77,584 | 29,63,052 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 6,20,628 | 9,37,172 |
| GPU | 6,40,290 | 9,96,086 |
| Memory | 2,82,939 | 4,09,648 |
| UX | 4,33,737 | 6,20,146 |
| Single-Core | 1,595 | 2,660 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,179 | 9,111 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Xring O1 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 3 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 4 Apple A19 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 6 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Xring O1
- 7 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 8 Apple A18 Pro vs Xring O1
- 9 Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
- 10 Xring O1 vs Google Tensor G4
Discussion