Xring O1 vs Apple A17 Pro
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the Xring O1 and the Apple A17 Pro side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 while the Apple A17 Pro runs the Apple A17 Pro GPU. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Xring O1
7 advantages
-
80% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 16.43 Lakhs
-
21% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 7,517
-
120 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 3780 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.6-A
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 2147 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,600 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Apple A17 Pro
2 advantages
-
12% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,987 vs 2,660
-
Larger L3 cache
24 MB vs 16 MB
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Xring O1 and the Apple A17 Pro compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | May 2025 | September 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Xiaomi | Apple |
| Model Number | - | APL1V02 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
2x 3.78 GHz - Performance cores 4x 2.11 GHz - Efficiency cores |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 3780 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.6-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 20 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB |
| TDP | - | 8W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Apple A17 Pro GPU |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 1398 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 2147 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | 44 TOPS | Apple Neural Engine |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | NVMe |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 48 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 2868 x 1320 |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K @ 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, HEVC, AV1, VP8, VP9, ProRes, Motion JPEG |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV, AIFF, CAF |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G | Snapdragon X70 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.90 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.20 Gbps | 3.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS |
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,63,052 | 16,43,269 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,37,172 | 6,00,198 |
| GPU | 9,96,086 | 4,71,123 |
| Memory | 4,09,648 | 2,30,169 |
| UX | 6,20,146 | 3,41,779 |
| Single-Core | 2,660 | 2,987 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 9,111 | 7,517 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Xring O1 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 2 Apple A18 Pro vs Xring O1
- 3 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 4 Google Tensor G5 vs Xring O1
- 5 Xring O1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 6 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 7 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 8 Apple A17 Pro vs Exynos 2600
- 9 Apple A18 Pro vs Apple A17 Pro
- 10 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Apple A17 Pro
Discussion