Xring O1 vs Google Tensor G4
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the Xring O1 and the Google Tensor G4 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 while the Google Tensor G4 runs the ARM Mali-G715 MP7. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Xring O1
9 advantages
-
100% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 14.85 Lakhs
-
99% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 4,581
-
37% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,660 vs 1,936
-
800 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 3100 MHz
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 1684.4 GFLOPS
-
534 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
Google Tensor G4
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Xring O1 and the Google Tensor G4 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | May 2025 | August 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Xiaomi | |
| Model Number | - | GS401 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
1x Cortex X4 - 3.1GHz 3x Cortex A720 - 2.6GHz 4x Cortex A520 - 1.95GHz |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | - | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | ARM Mali-G715 MP7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 1344 shaders |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 1684.4 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | 44 TOPS | Google Edge TPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 200MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G | Samsung Exynos 5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.90 Gbps | 14.79 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.20 Gbps | 3.87 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,63,052 | 14,85,111 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,37,172 | 5,20,100 |
| GPU | 9,96,086 | 4,16,199 |
| Memory | 4,09,648 | 2,32,401 |
| UX | 6,20,146 | 3,16,411 |
| Single-Core | 2,660 | 1,936 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 9,111 | 4,581 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Xring O1 | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 2 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 3 Apple A16 Bionic vs Xring O1
- 4 Xring O1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 5 Google Tensor G5 vs Xring O1
- 6 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Google Tensor G4
- 7 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Google Tensor G4
- 8 Apple A18 Pro vs Google Tensor G4
- 9 Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 10 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Google Tensor G4
Discussion