Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
Across 12 measured categories, the Samsung Exynos 2500 comes out ahead.
I put the Google Tensor G4 and the Samsung Exynos 2500 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Google Tensor G4 runs the ARM Mali-G715 MP7 while the Samsung Exynos 2500 runs the Samsung Xclipse 950. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Google Tensor G4
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Samsung Exynos 2500
8 advantages
-
45% higher AnTuTu score
21.55 Lakhs vs 14.85 Lakhs
-
61% faster Geekbench multi-core score
7,361 vs 4,581
-
15% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,228 vs 1,936
-
200 MHz higher CPU clock
3300 MHz vs 3100 MHz
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 1684.4 GFLOPS
-
534 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Google Tensor G4 and the Samsung Exynos 2500 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | August 2024 | June 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | |
| Model Number | GS401 | S5E9955 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x Cortex X4 - 3.1GHz 3x Cortex A720 - 2.6GHz 4x Cortex A520 - 1.95GHz |
1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925 2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725 5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725 2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
| L2 Cache | - | 11 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
| TDP | 6 W | 6 Watts |
| GPU Name | ARM Mali-G715 MP7 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1344 shaders | 64 |
| FLOPS | 1684.4 GFLOPS | 4091.9 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | No | Yes |
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | - |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4266 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 200MP | 320MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | Samsung Exynos 5400 | Exynos 5400 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 14.79 Gbps | 9.64 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.87 Gbps | 2.55 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 14,85,111 | 21,54,825 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,20,100 | 5,14,532 |
| GPU | 4,16,199 | 9,46,368 |
| Memory | 2,32,401 | 3,83,044 |
| UX | 3,16,411 | 3,10,881 |
| Single-Core | 1,936 | 2,228 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 4,581 | 7,361 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G4
- 2 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Google Tensor G4
- 3 Apple A17 Pro vs Google Tensor G4
- 4 Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G4
- 5 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Google Tensor G4
- 6 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 7 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 8 Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 9 Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 10 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Discussion