MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
The MediaTek Dimensity 9300 leads the Samsung Exynos 2500 by 7% on AnTuTu v11 (22.96 Lakhs vs 21.55 Lakhs), but the Samsung Exynos 2500 is 6% faster in Geekbench multi-core. Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 does better: 2% higher peak CPU clock (3.3 GHz vs 3.25 GHz) and newer Arm instruction set (ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A).
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Samsung Exynos 2500: key differences
Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 leads
-
7% higher AnTuTu v11 score
22.96 Lakhs vs 21.55 Lakhs
Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 leads
-
2% higher peak CPU clock
3.3 GHz vs 3.25 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
2x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 8 MB
-
Smaller process node
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
2% more GPU compute power
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 3993.6 GFLOPS
-
6% faster in Geekbench multi-core
7,361 vs 6,953
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+7% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+3% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+6% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- November 2023
- June 2025
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- MediaTek
- Samsung
- Model Number
- MT6989
- S5E9955
CPU
- Total Cores
- 8
- 10
- Core Configuration
- 4x 3.25 GHz - Cortex X4
4x 2.0 GHz - Cortex A720 - 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - Max Frequency
- 3250 MHz
- 3300 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9-A
- ARMv9.2-A
- Process Node
- 4 nm
- 3 nm
- Manufacturing
- TSMC
- Samsung
- L2 Cache
- 1 MB
- 11 MB
- L3 Cache
- 8 MB
- 16 MB
- TDP
- 7 Watts
- 6 Watts
GPU
- GPU Name
- Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- GPU Frequency
- 850 MHz
- 999 MHz
- Shading Units
- 768
- 64
- FLOPS
- 3993.6 GFLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- MediaTek APU 790
- -
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 4800 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x16-bit
- 4x 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 76.8 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 4.0
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 320MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
- 8K at 30FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, HEVC, AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- MediaTek T830 5G
- Exynos 5400 5G
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 7.9 Gbps
- 9.64 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.2 Gbps
- 2.55 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 5.4
- Navigation
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 22,95,875
- 21,54,825
- CPU
- 7,27,963
- 5,14,532
- GPU
- 7,56,125
- 9,46,368
- Memory
- 2,78,247
- 3,83,044
- UX
- 5,33,540
- 3,10,881
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,170
- 2,228
- Multi-Core
- 6,953
- 7,361
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+3 pointsCPU Score
+3 pointsGPU Score
+3 pointsMemory Score
More Dimensity 9300 and Exynos 2500 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.