MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Google Tensor G4
Across 12 measured categories, the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 comes out ahead.
I put the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and the Google Tensor G4 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 runs the Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU while the Google Tensor G4 runs the ARM Mali-G715 MP7. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
7 advantages
-
55% higher AnTuTu score
22.96 Lakhs vs 14.85 Lakhs
-
52% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,953 vs 4,581
-
12% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,170 vs 1,936
-
150 MHz higher CPU clock
3250 MHz vs 3100 MHz
-
Larger L3 cache
8 MB vs 4 MB
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
3993.6 GFLOPS vs 1684.4 GFLOPS
-
534 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
Google Tensor G4
1 advantage
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and the Google Tensor G4 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | November 2023 | August 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | |
| Model Number | MT6989 | GS401 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 4x 3.25 GHz - Cortex X4 4x 2.0 GHz - Cortex A720 |
1x Cortex X4 - 3.1GHz 3x Cortex A720 - 2.6GHz 4x Cortex A520 - 1.95GHz |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 7 Watts | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | ARM Mali-G715 MP7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1344 shaders |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 1684.4 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | MediaTek APU 790 | Google Edge TPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 200MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, HEVC, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | MediaTek T830 5G | Samsung Exynos 5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.9 Gbps | 14.79 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.2 Gbps | 3.87 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 22,95,875 | 14,85,111 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 7,27,963 | 5,20,100 |
| GPU | 7,56,125 | 4,16,199 |
| Memory | 2,78,247 | 2,32,401 |
| UX | 5,33,540 | 3,16,411 |
| Single-Core | 2,170 | 1,936 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,953 | 4,581 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Google Tensor G5 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
- 2 Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
- 3 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 4 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 6 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G4
- 7 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Google Tensor G4
- 8 Apple A17 Pro vs Google Tensor G4
- 9 Google Tensor G5 vs Google Tensor G4
- 10 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Google Tensor G4
Discussion