Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
The Exynos 2600 leads the Samsung Exynos 2500 by 36% on AnTuTu v11 (29.29 Lakhs vs 21.55 Lakhs) and is 28% faster in Geekbench single-core and 38% in multi-core. Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 does better: 14% faster RAM (4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz).
Exynos 2600 vs Samsung Exynos 2500: key differences
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
15% higher peak CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9.2-A
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 3 nm
-
72% more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 4091.9 GFLOPS
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
-
36% higher AnTuTu v11 score
29.29 Lakhs vs 21.55 Lakhs
-
38% faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 7,361
-
28% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,843 vs 2,228
Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 leads
-
14% faster RAM
4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+36% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+28% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+38% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- December 2025
- June 2025
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- Samsung
- Model Number
- Exynos 2600
- S5E9955
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 10
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - Max Frequency
- 3.8 GHz
- 3300 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.3
- ARMv9.2-A
- Process Node
- 2 nm
- 3 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- Samsung
- L2 Cache
- -
- 11 MB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 16 MB
- TDP
- -
- 6 Watts
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- GPU Frequency
- 985 MHz
- 999 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 64
- FLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- 32K MAC NPU
- -
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4200 MHz
- 4800 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 67.2 GB/s
- 76.8 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.1
- UFS 4.0
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 320MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K at 120Hz
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 30FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5410
- Exynos 5400 5G
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 14.79 Gbps
- 9.64 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.90 Gbps
- 2.55 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 6.1
- 5.4
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 29,29,281
- 21,54,825
- CPU
- 9,56,605
- 5,14,532
- GPU
- 10,97,739
- 9,46,368
- Memory
- 4,24,610
- 3,83,044
- UX
- 4,50,327
- 3,10,881
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,843
- 2,228
- Multi-Core
- 10,192
- 7,361
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+8 pointsCPU Score
+8 pointsGPU Score
+14 pointsMemory Score
+1 pointMore Exynos 2600 and Exynos 2500 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.