Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G4
Across 12 measured categories, the Exynos 2600 comes out ahead.
I put the Exynos 2600 and the Google Tensor G4 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Exynos 2600 runs the Samsung Xclipse 960 while the Google Tensor G4 runs the ARM Mali-G715 MP7. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Exynos 2600
9 advantages
-
97% higher AnTuTu score
29.29 Lakhs vs 14.85 Lakhs
-
122% faster Geekbench multi-core score
10,192 vs 4,581
-
47% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,843 vs 1,936
-
700 MHz higher CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 3100 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9.2-A
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
2 nm smaller semiconductor size
2 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 1684.4 GFLOPS
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
Google Tensor G4
1 advantage
-
66 MHz higher RAM speed
4266 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Exynos 2600 and the Google Tensor G4 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | December 2025 | August 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | |
| Model Number | Exynos 2600 | GS401 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro 6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro |
1x Cortex X4 - 3.1GHz 3x Cortex A720 - 2.6GHz 4x Cortex A520 - 1.95GHz |
| Max Frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3100 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.3 | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 2 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | - | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 960 | ARM Mali-G715 MP7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 985 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 1344 shaders |
| FLOPS | 7024.6 GFLOPS | 1684.4 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | 32K MAC NPU | Google Edge TPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 200MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K at 120Hz | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Exynos 5410 | Samsung Exynos 5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 14.79 Gbps | 14.79 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.90 Gbps | 3.87 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,29,281 | 14,85,111 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,56,605 | 5,20,100 |
| GPU | 10,97,739 | 4,16,199 |
| Memory | 4,24,610 | 2,32,401 |
| UX | 4,50,327 | 3,16,411 |
| Single-Core | 2,843 | 1,936 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 10,192 | 4,581 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Exynos 2600
- 2 Apple A17 Pro vs Exynos 2600
- 3 Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 4 Exynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G5
- 5 Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- 6 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Google Tensor G4
- 7 Apple A18 Pro vs Google Tensor G4
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 vs Google Tensor G4
- 9 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G4
- 10 Xring O1 vs Google Tensor G4
Discussion