MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Exynos 2600
The Exynos 2600 leads the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 by 67% on AnTuTu v11 (29.29 Lakhs vs 17.55 Lakhs) and is 51% faster in Geekbench single-core and 2.2x in multi-core. Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 does better: 2% faster RAM (4266 MHz vs 4200 MHz).
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Exynos 2600: key differences
Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 leads
-
2% faster RAM
4266 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
25% higher peak CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 3.05 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9-A
-
2x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 8 MB
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 4 nm
-
2.5x more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 2762.5 GFLOPS
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
-
67% higher AnTuTu v11 score
29.29 Lakhs vs 17.55 Lakhs
-
2.2x faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 4,542
-
51% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,843 vs 1,882
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+67% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+51% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
2.2x fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- November 2022
- December 2025
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- MediaTek
- Samsung
- Model Number
- MT6985
- Exynos 2600
CPU
- Total Cores
- 8
- 10
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.05 GHz - Cortex X3
3x 2.85 GHz - Cortex A715
4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A510 - 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - Max Frequency
- 3050 MHz
- 3.8 GHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9-A
- ARMv9.3
- Process Node
- 4 nm
- 2 nm
- Manufacturing
- TSMC
- Samsung
- L2 Cache
- 1 MB
- -
- L3 Cache
- 8 MB
- 16 MB
- TDP
- 7 W
- -
GPU
- GPU Name
- Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- GPU Frequency
- 981 MHz
- 985 MHz
- Shading Units
- 1408
- 128
- FLOPS
- 2762.5 GFLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- MediaTek APU 690
- 32K MAC NPU
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4266 MHz
- 4200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x16-bit channels
- 4x 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 68.3 GB/s
- 67.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 4.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K @ 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K at 120Hz
- Video Playback
- 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- Audio Codecs
- AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- -
- Exynos 5410
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 7.67 Gbps
- 14.79 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 3.25 Gbps
- 4.90 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- 6.1
- Navigation
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 17,54,862
- 29,29,281
- CPU
- 5,72,418
- 9,56,605
- GPU
- 4,51,973
- 10,97,739
- Memory
- 2,94,681
- 4,24,610
- UX
- 4,35,790
- 4,50,327
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 1,882
- 2,843
- Multi-Core
- 4,542
- 10,192
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+20 pointsCPU Score
+25 pointsGPU Score
+27 pointsMemory Score
+6 pointsMore Dimensity 9200 and Exynos 2600 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.