Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
The Samsung Exynos 2500 leads the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 by 23% on AnTuTu v11 (21.55 Lakhs vs 17.55 Lakhs) and is 18% faster in Geekbench single-core and 62% in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the MediaTek Dimensity 9200.
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200: key differences
Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 leads
-
8% higher peak CPU clock
3.3 GHz vs 3.05 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
2x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 8 MB
-
Smaller process node
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
48% more GPU compute power
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 2762.5 GFLOPS
-
13% faster RAM
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
-
23% higher AnTuTu v11 score
21.55 Lakhs vs 17.55 Lakhs
-
62% faster in Geekbench multi-core
7,361 vs 4,542
-
18% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,228 vs 1,882
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+23% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+18% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+62% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- June 2025
- November 2022
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- MediaTek
- Model Number
- S5E9955
- MT6985
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - 1x 3.05 GHz - Cortex X3
3x 2.85 GHz - Cortex A715
4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A510 - Max Frequency
- 3300 MHz
- 3050 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv9-A
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 4 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- TSMC
- L2 Cache
- 11 MB
- 1 MB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 8 MB
- TDP
- 6 Watts
- 7 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU
- GPU Frequency
- 999 MHz
- 981 MHz
- Shading Units
- 64
- 1408
- FLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- 2762.5 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- -
- MediaTek APU 690
- API Support
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 4266 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x16-bit channels
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 68.3 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 4.0
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K @ 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS
- 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5400 5G
- -
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 9.64 Gbps
- 7.67 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 2.55 Gbps
- 3.25 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 5.3
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 21,54,825
- 17,54,862
- CPU
- 5,14,532
- 5,72,418
- GPU
- 9,46,368
- 4,51,973
- Memory
- 3,83,044
- 2,94,681
- UX
- 3,10,881
- 4,35,790
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,228
- 1,882
- Multi-Core
- 7,361
- 4,542
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+12 pointsCPU Score
+17 pointsGPU Score
+13 pointsMemory Score
+5 pointsMore Exynos 2500 and Dimensity 9200 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.