Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Across 12 measured categories, the Samsung Exynos 2500 comes out ahead.
I put the Samsung Exynos 2500 and the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Samsung Exynos 2500 runs the Samsung Xclipse 950 while the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 runs the Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Samsung Exynos 2500
9 advantages
-
23% higher AnTuTu score
21.55 Lakhs vs 17.55 Lakhs
-
62% faster Geekbench multi-core score
7,361 vs 4,542
-
18% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,228 vs 1,882
-
250 MHz higher CPU clock
3300 MHz vs 3050 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 8 MB
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 2762.5 GFLOPS
-
534 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Samsung Exynos 2500 and the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | June 2025 | November 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Model Number | S5E9955 | MT6985 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925 2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725 5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725 2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 |
1x 3.05 GHz - Cortex X3 3x 2.85 GHz - Cortex A715 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A510 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 3050 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 11 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | 6 Watts | 7 W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 950 | Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 999 MHz | 981 MHz |
| Shading Units | 64 | 1408 |
| FLOPS | 4091.9 GFLOPS | 2762.5 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | - | MediaTek APU 690 |
| API Support | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x16-bit channels |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 68.3 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K @ 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV |
| Modem | Exynos 5400 5G | - |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 9.64 Gbps | 7.67 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 2.55 Gbps | 3.25 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 21,54,825 | 17,54,862 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,14,532 | 5,72,418 |
| GPU | 9,46,368 | 4,51,973 |
| Memory | 3,83,044 | 2,94,681 |
| UX | 3,10,881 | 4,35,790 |
| Single-Core | 2,228 | 1,882 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 7,361 | 4,542 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Samsung Exynos 2500 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 3 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 4 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Xring O1
- 5 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 6 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- 7 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- 8 Apple A18 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- 9 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Google Tensor G5
- 10 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Discussion