Google Tensor G4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Across 12 measured categories, the Google Tensor G4 comes out ahead.
I put the Google Tensor G4 and the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Google Tensor G4 runs the ARM Mali-G715 MP7 while the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 runs the Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Google Tensor G4
4 advantages
-
1% faster Geekbench multi-core score
4,581 vs 4,542
-
3% faster Geekbench single-core score
1,936 vs 1,882
-
50 MHz higher CPU clock
3100 MHz vs 3050 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3 advantages
-
18% higher AnTuTu score
17.55 Lakhs vs 14.85 Lakhs
-
Larger L3 cache
8 MB vs 4 MB
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
2762.5 GFLOPS vs 1684.4 GFLOPS
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Google Tensor G4 and the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | August 2024 | November 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | |
| Model Number | GS401 | MT6985 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x Cortex X4 - 3.1GHz 3x Cortex A720 - 2.6GHz 4x Cortex A520 - 1.95GHz |
1x 3.05 GHz - Cortex X3 3x 2.85 GHz - Cortex A715 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex A510 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 3050 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | 6 W | 7 W |
| GPU Name | ARM Mali-G715 MP7 | Arm Immortalis-G715 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 981 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1344 shaders | 1408 |
| FLOPS | 1684.4 GFLOPS | 2762.5 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | No | Yes |
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | MediaTek APU 690 |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4266 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x16-bit channels |
| Max Bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 68.3 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 200MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K @ 60FPS, 1080p at 240FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV |
| Modem | Samsung Exynos 5400 | - |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 14.79 Gbps | 7.67 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.87 Gbps | 3.25 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 14,85,111 | 17,54,862 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,20,100 | 5,72,418 |
| GPU | 4,16,199 | 4,51,973 |
| Memory | 2,32,401 | 2,94,681 |
| UX | 3,16,411 | 4,35,790 |
| Single-Core | 1,936 | 1,882 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 4,581 | 4,542 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Google Tensor G4
- 2 Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 3 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Google Tensor G4
- 4 Apple A18 Pro vs Google Tensor G4
- 5 Google Tensor G5 vs Google Tensor G4
- 6 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- 7 Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Google Tensor G5
- 9 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 10 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Discussion