Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Exynos 2600
Across 12 measured categories, the Exynos 2600 comes out ahead.
I put the Xiaomi Xring O1 and the Exynos 2600 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Xiaomi Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 while the Exynos 2600 runs the Samsung Xclipse 960. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Xring O1
3 advantages
-
1% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 29.29 Lakhs
-
100 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 3.8 GHz
-
600 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Exynos 2600
5 advantages
-
12% faster Geekbench multi-core score
10,192 vs 9,111
-
7% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,843 vs 2,660
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9.2-A
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
2 nm vs 3 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 5701.6 GFLOPS
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Xring O1 and the Exynos 2600 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | May 2025 | December 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Model Number | - | Exynos 2600 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro 6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.3 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 2 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 985 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 7024.6 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | 44 TOPS | 32K MAC NPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K at 120Hz |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G | Exynos 5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.90 Gbps | 14.79 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.20 Gbps | 4.90 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,63,052 | 29,29,281 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,37,172 | 9,56,605 |
| GPU | 9,96,086 | 10,97,739 |
| Memory | 4,09,648 | 4,24,610 |
| UX | 6,20,146 | 4,50,327 |
| Single-Core | 2,660 | 2,843 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 9,111 | 10,192 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Xring O1 | Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite
- 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 3 Xring O1 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 4 Xring O1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 5 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 6 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
- 7 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Exynos 2600
- 8 Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2600
- 9 Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Exynos 2400
- 10 MediaTek Dimensity 8450 vs Exynos 2600
Discussion