Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Exynos 2600
The Xring O1 and the Exynos 2600 are within 1% of each other on AnTuTu v11 (29.63 Lakhs vs 29.29 Lakhs). In Geekbench, the Exynos 2600 is 7% faster in single-core and 12% faster in multi-core. Where the Xring O1 does better: 3% higher peak CPU clock (3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz) and 14% faster RAM (4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz).
Xring O1 vs Exynos 2600: key differences
Where the Xring O1 leads
-
3% higher peak CPU clock
3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
-
14% faster RAM
4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9.2-A
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 3 nm
-
23% more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 5701.6 GFLOPS
-
12% faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 9,111
-
7% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,843 vs 2,660
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+1% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+7% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+12% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- May 2025
- December 2025
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Xiaomi
- Samsung
- Model Number
- -
- Exynos 2600
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 10
- Core Configuration
- 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925
4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725
2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725
2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 - 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - Max Frequency
- 3900 MHz
- 3.8 GHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv9.3
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 2 nm
- Manufacturing
- TSMC
- Samsung
- L2 Cache
- 2 MB
- -
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 16 MB
GPU
- GPU Name
- Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- GPU Frequency
- 1392 MHz
- 985 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 128
- FLOPS
- 5701.6 GFLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- 44 TOPS
- 32K MAC NPU
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 4200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 67.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.1
- UFS 4.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K at 120Hz
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- MediaTek T800 5G
- Exynos 5410
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 7.90 Gbps
- 14.79 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.20 Gbps
- 4.90 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 6.1
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 29,63,052
- 29,29,281
- CPU
- 9,37,172
- 9,56,605
- GPU
- 9,96,086
- 10,97,739
- Memory
- 4,09,648
- 4,24,610
- UX
- 6,20,146
- 4,50,327
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,660
- 2,843
- Multi-Core
- 9,111
- 10,192
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+5 pointsCPU Score
+1 pointGPU Score
+13 pointsMemory Score
More Xring O1 and Exynos 2600 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.