Xring O1 vs Exynos 2600
vs
In this comparison, we take a closer look at two SoCs, Xring O1 vs Exynos 2600, based on their benchmarks and specifications. The Xring O1 comes with a deca-core CPU paired with an Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 GPU, while the Exynos 2600 comes with a deca-core CPU and the Samsung Xclipse 960 GPU.
Why Xring O1 is better than Exynos 2600
- 3% Faster CPU clock speed (3900 MHz vs Up to 3.8 GHz)
- 14% higher memory frequency (4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz)
Why Exynos 2600 is better than Xring O1
- Newer Bluetooth 6.1 vs 5.4
- Newer CPU architecture (ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9.2-A)
- More advanced 2 nm process vs 3 nm
Performance Scores
CPU score
Xring O1
88
Exynos 2600
89
GPU score
Xring O1
86
Exynos 2600
99
Memory score
Xring O1
96
Exynos 2600
96
Total score
Xring O1
90
Exynos 2600
95
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2600 +15%
Xring O1
2,574,975
Exynos 2600
2,958,206
| CPU | 599,721 | 989,619 |
| GPU | 1,067,788 | 1,108,584 |
| MEM | 538,743 | 388,039 |
| UX | 368,723 | 471,964 |
| TOTAL | 2,574,975 | 2,958,206 |
Geekbench 6
Single-Core
Xring O1 +0%
Xring O1
2,967
Exynos 2600
2,961
Multi-Core
Exynos 2600 +10%
Xring O1
9,123
Exynos 2600
9,990
| Single-Core | 2,967 | 2,961 |
| Multi-Core | 9,123 | 9,990 |
Gaming FPS Support
BGMI/PUBG Mobile
Smooth preset
Xring O1
60 FPS
Exynos 2600
–
Ultra HD preset
Xring O1
60 FPS
Exynos 2600
–
Call of Duty Mobile
Low preset
Xring O1
120 FPS
Exynos 2600
–
Max preset
Xring O1
60 FPS
Exynos 2600
–
Free Fire
Smooth preset
Xring O1
60 FPS
Exynos 2600
–
Ultra preset
Xring O1
60 FPS
Exynos 2600
–
Genshin Impact
Low preset
Xring O1
120 FPS
Exynos 2600
–
Highest preset
Xring O1
60 FPS
Exynos 2600
–
Fortnite
Low preset
Xring O1
-
Exynos 2600
–
Epic preset
Xring O1
-
Exynos 2600
–
| Game | Xring O1 | Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| BGMI/PUBG Mobile |
60 FPS (Smooth)
60 FPS (Ultra HD) |
–
– |
| Call of Duty Mobile |
120 FPS (Low)
60 FPS (Max) |
–
– |
| Free Fire |
60 FPS (Smooth)
60 FPS (Ultra) |
–
– |
| Genshin Impact |
120 FPS (Low)
60 FPS (Highest) |
–
– |
| Fortnite |
- (Low)
- (Epic) |
–
– |
Note: "Locked" means restricted by the game or device. Shown FPS is the selectable option; performance may vary.
Xring O1
vs
Exynos 2600
General
| Chipset | Xring O1 | Exynos 2600 |
| Launch Date | May 2025 | December 2025 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model Number | - | Exynos 2600 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
CPU
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro 6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro |
| CPU Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Max Clock Speed | 3900 MHz | Up to 3.8 GHz |
| Architecture | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.3 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | - |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 2 nm |
| TDP | - | - |
GPU
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 985 MHz |
| Neural Processing Unit | 44 TOPS | 32K MAC NPU |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| Compute Performance | 5.701 TFLOPS | N/A |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
Memory & Storage
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
ISP & Multimedia
| Max Camera | 320 MP | 320 MP |
| Video Capture | 8K @ 30fps 4K @ 120fps |
8K @ 30fps 4K @ 120fps |
| Video Playback | 8K @ 30fps 4K @ 120fps |
8K @ 30fps 4K @ 120fps |
| Video Codecs | H.264 H.265/HEVC AV1 VP9 |
H.264 HEVC H.265 AV1 VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC FLAC HE-AACv1 HE-AACv2 MP3 |
AAC LC FLAC ,HE-AACv1 HE-AACv2,MP3 |
| Display Support | 3840x2160 | 4K @ 120Hz |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G Modem | Exynos 5410 (5G) |
| 4G Support | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download Speed | Up to 7.90 Gbps | Up to 14.79 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | Up to 4.20 Gbps | up to 4.90 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 | 6.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |