Apple A18 Pro vs Exynos 2600
Geekbench is split: the Apple A18 Pro is 22% faster in single-core, while the Exynos 2600 is 19% faster in multi-core. Where the Apple A18 Pro does better: 6% higher peak CPU clock (4.04 GHz vs 3.8 GHz) and 50% larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Apple A18 Pro vs Exynos 2600: key differences
Where the Apple A18 Pro leads
-
6% higher peak CPU clock
4.04 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
-
50% larger L3 cache
24 MB vs 16 MB
-
22% faster in Geekbench single-core
3,462 vs 2,843
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9.2-A
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 3 nm
-
3.1x more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 2298 GFLOPS
-
12% faster RAM
4200 MHz vs 3750 MHz
-
19% faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 8,586
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
AnTuTu scores from iOS and Android are not directly comparable, so no winner is marked.
Geekbench Single-Core
+22% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+19% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- September 2024
- December 2025
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Apple
- Samsung
- Model Number
- APL1V07
- Exynos 2600
CPU
- Total Cores
- 6
- 10
- Core Configuration
- 2x 4.04 GHz Performance Cores
4x 2.42 GHz Efficiency Cores - 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - Max Frequency
- 4040 MHz
- 3.8 GHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv9.3
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 2 nm
- Manufacturing
- TSMC
- Samsung
- L2 Cache
- 20 MB
- -
- L3 Cache
- 24 MB
- 16 MB
- TDP
- 12 W
- -
GPU
- GPU Name
- Apple A18 Pro (6-core GPU)
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- GPU Frequency
- 1490 MHz
- 985 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 128
- FLOPS
- 2298 GFLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- Apple Neural Engine
- 32K MAC NPU
- API Support
- Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 3750 MHz
- 4200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 60 GB/s
- 67.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 8 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- NVMe
- UFS 4.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 48 MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 4K @ 120FPS, 8K @ 24FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 2868 x 1320
- 4K at 120Hz
- Video Playback
- 4K @ 120FPS, 8K @ 24FPS, HDR10, Dolby Vision
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1, VP8, VP9, ProRes, Motion JPEG
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- Audio Codecs
- AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV, AIFF
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- Snapdragon X75 5G
- Exynos 5410
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 10 Gbps
- 14.79 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 3.5 Gbps
- 4.90 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- Wi-Fi 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 5.3
- 6.1
- Navigation
- NAVIC, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
AnTuTu scores from iOS and Android are not directly comparable, so no winner is marked.
- Total
- 17,44,311
- 29,29,281
- CPU
- 4,78,128
- 9,56,605
- GPU
- 6,51,500
- 10,97,739
- Memory
- 2,48,568
- 4,24,610
- UX
- 3,66,115
- 4,50,327
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 3,462
- 2,843
- Multi-Core
- 8,586
- 10,192
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+5 pointsCPU Score
+2 pointsGPU Score
+7 pointsMemory Score
+6 pointsMore Apple A18 Pro and Exynos 2600 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.