Apple A18 Pro vs Xring O1
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the Apple A18 Pro and the Xring O1 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Apple A18 Pro runs the Apple A18 Pro (6-core GPU) while the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Apple A18 Pro
3 advantages
-
30% faster Geekbench single-core score
3,462 vs 2,660
-
140 MHz higher CPU clock
4040 MHz vs 3900 MHz
-
Larger L3 cache
24 MB vs 16 MB
Xring O1
4 advantages
-
70% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 17.44 Lakhs
-
6% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 8,586
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 2298 GFLOPS
-
1,050 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 3750 MHz
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Apple A18 Pro and the Xring O1 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | September 2024 | May 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Apple | Xiaomi |
| Model Number | APL1V07 | - |
| Total Cores | 6 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 4.04 GHz Performance Cores 4x 2.42 GHz Efficiency Cores |
2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
| Max Frequency | 4040 MHz | 3900 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 16 MB |
| TDP | 12 W | - |
| GPU Name | Apple A18 Pro (6-core GPU) | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1490 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 2298 GFLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | Apple Neural Engine | 44 TOPS |
| API Support | Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 3750 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 60 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | NVMe | UFS 4.1 |
| Camera Support | 48 MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 4K @ 120FPS, 8K @ 24FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 2868 x 1320 | 4K |
| Video Playback | 4K @ 120FPS, 8K @ 24FPS, HDR10, Dolby Vision | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1, VP8, VP9, ProRes, Motion JPEG | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV, AIFF | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | Snapdragon X75 5G | MediaTek T800 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 10 Gbps | 7.90 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.5 Gbps | 4.20 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | NAVIC, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
Benchmark results
| Total | 17,44,311 | 29,63,052 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 4,78,128 | 9,37,172 |
| GPU | 6,51,500 | 9,96,086 |
| Memory | 2,48,568 | 4,09,648 |
| UX | 3,66,115 | 6,20,146 |
| Single-Core | 3,462 | 2,660 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 8,586 | 9,111 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Apple A18 Pro | Xring O1 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Apple A19 Pro vs Apple A18 Pro
- 2 Apple A18 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 3 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Apple A18 Pro
- 4 Apple A18 Pro vs Exynos 2600
- 5 Apple A16 Bionic vs Apple A18 Pro
- 6 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500
- 7 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 8 Apple A19 Pro vs Xring O1
- 9 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Xring O1
- 10 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Xring O1
Discussion