Xring O1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the Xring O1 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 while the Samsung Exynos 2400 runs the Samsung Xclipse 940. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Xring O1
9 advantages
-
47% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 20.18 Lakhs
-
34% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 6,785
-
29% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,660 vs 2,067
-
690 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 3210 MHz
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 8 MB
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 3407 GFLOPS
-
600 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
Samsung Exynos 2400
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Xring O1 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | May 2025 | January 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Model Number | - | S5E9945 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3900 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | - | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1392 MHz | 1009 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS | 3407 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | 44 TOPS | Exynos AI Engine |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 4 × 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | MediaTek T800 5G | Exynos 5300 Modem |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.90 Gbps | 12.1 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.20 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 29,63,052 | 20,17,639 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 9,37,172 | 69,80,818 |
| GPU | 9,96,086 | 6,16,764 |
| Memory | 4,09,648 | 3,05,547 |
| UX | 6,20,146 | 4,04,510 |
| Single-Core | 2,660 | 2,067 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 9,111 | 6,785 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Xring O1 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Google Tensor G5 vs Xring O1
- 2 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
- 3 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Xring O1
- 4 Apple A18 Pro vs Xring O1
- 5 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500
- 6 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 7 Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 8 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 9 Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Exynos 2400
- 10 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Discussion