Xring O1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
The Xring O1 leads the Samsung Exynos 2400 by 47% on AnTuTu v11 (29.63 Lakhs vs 20.18 Lakhs) and is 29% faster in Geekbench single-core and 34% in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the Samsung Exynos 2400.
Xring O1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400: key differences
Where the Xring O1 leads
-
21% higher peak CPU clock
3.9 GHz vs 3.21 GHz
-
2x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 8 MB
-
Smaller process node
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
67% more GPU compute power
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 3407 GFLOPS
-
14% faster RAM
4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
-
47% higher AnTuTu v11 score
29.63 Lakhs vs 20.18 Lakhs
-
34% faster in Geekbench multi-core
9,111 vs 6,785
-
29% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,660 vs 2,067
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+47% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+29% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+34% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- May 2025
- January 2024
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Xiaomi
- Samsung
- Model Number
- -
- S5E9945
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 10
- Core Configuration
- 2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925
4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725
2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725
2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 - 1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 - Max Frequency
- 3900 MHz
- 3210 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv9.2-A
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 4 nm
- Manufacturing
- TSMC
- Samsung Foundry
- L2 Cache
- 2 MB
- -
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 8 MB
- TDP
- -
- 6 W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16
- Samsung Xclipse 940
- GPU Frequency
- 1392 MHz
- 1009 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 768
- FLOPS
- 5701.6 GFLOPS
- 3407 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- 44 TOPS
- Exynos AI Engine
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 4200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4 × 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 67.2 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.1
- UFS 4.0
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- MediaTek T800 5G
- Exynos 5300 Modem
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 7.90 Gbps
- 12.1 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.20 Gbps
- 3.67 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 6E
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 5.3
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 29,63,052
- 20,17,639
- CPU
- 9,37,172
- 69,80,818
- GPU
- 9,96,086
- 6,16,764
- Memory
- 4,09,648
- 3,05,547
- UX
- 6,20,146
- 4,04,510
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,660
- 2,067
- Multi-Core
- 9,111
- 6,785
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+9 pointsCPU Score
+14 pointsGPU Score
+12 pointsMemory Score
+2 pointsMore Xring O1 and Exynos 2400 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.