Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Across 12 measured categories, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 comes out ahead.
I put the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 runs the Adreno 840 while the Samsung Exynos 2400 runs the Samsung Xclipse 940. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
8 advantages
-
88% higher AnTuTu score
37.89 Lakhs vs 20.18 Lakhs
-
62% faster Geekbench multi-core score
10,983 vs 6,785
-
79% faster Geekbench single-core score
3,690 vs 2,067
-
1,400 MHz higher CPU clock
4610 MHz vs 3210 MHz
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 4 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
3686 GFLOPS vs 3407 GFLOPS
-
1,100 MHz higher RAM speed
5300 MHz vs 4200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
Samsung Exynos 2400
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | September 2025 | January 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm | Samsung |
| Model Number | SM8850 | S5E9945 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2 x 4.61 GHz (3rd-gen Oryon cores) 6 x 3.63 GHz (3rd-gen Oryon cores) |
1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max Frequency | 4610 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | - | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Adreno 840 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1009 MHz |
| Shading Units | 512 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 3686 GFLOPS | 3407 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | Hexagon NPU | Exynos AI Engine |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 5300 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x16-bit | 4 × 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 84.8 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, AV1 | H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, LDAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Snapdragon X85 | Exynos 5300 Modem |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 12.5 Gbps | 12.1 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.7 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 37,89,020 | 20,17,639 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 10,80,698 | 69,80,818 |
| GPU | 14,29,751 | 6,16,764 |
| Memory | 4,06,941 | 3,05,547 |
| UX | 8,71,630 | 4,04,510 |
| Single-Core | 3,690 | 2,067 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 10,983 | 6,785 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Exynos 2600
- 2 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite
- 3 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- 4 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Apple A18 Pro
- 5 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Google Tensor G5
- 6 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 7 Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Exynos 2400
Discussion