MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
Across 12 measured categories, the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 comes out ahead.
I put the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 runs the Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU while the Samsung Exynos 2400 runs the Samsung Xclipse 940. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
6 advantages
-
14% higher AnTuTu score
22.96 Lakhs vs 20.18 Lakhs
-
2% faster Geekbench multi-core score
6,953 vs 6,785
-
5% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,170 vs 2,067
-
40 MHz higher CPU clock
3250 MHz vs 3210 MHz
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
3993.6 GFLOPS vs 3407 GFLOPS
-
600 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400
1 advantage
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and the Samsung Exynos 2400 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | November 2023 | January 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Model Number | MT6989 | S5E9945 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 4x 3.25 GHz - Cortex X4 4x 2.0 GHz - Cortex A720 |
1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| TDP | 7 Watts | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1009 MHz |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 3407 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | MediaTek APU 790 | Exynos AI Engine |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x16-bit | 4 × 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 60 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, HEVC, AV1, VP9 | H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | MediaTek T830 5G | Exynos 5300 Modem |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7.9 Gbps | 12.1 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 4.2 Gbps | 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 22,95,875 | 20,17,639 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 7,27,963 | 69,80,818 |
| GPU | 7,56,125 | 6,16,764 |
| Memory | 2,78,247 | 3,05,547 |
| UX | 5,33,540 | 4,04,510 |
| Single-Core | 2,170 | 2,067 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 6,953 | 6,785 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
- 2 Google Tensor G5 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
- 3 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
- 4 Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
- 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 6 Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Exynos 2400
- 7 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
- 8 Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 9 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 10 Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G4
Discussion