Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
The Exynos 2600 leads the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 by 7% on AnTuTu v11 (29.29 Lakhs vs 27.27 Lakhs) and is 10% faster in Geekbench single-core and 32% in multi-core. Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 does better: 27% faster RAM (5333 MHz vs 4200 MHz).
Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400: key differences
Where the Exynos 2600 leads
-
5% higher peak CPU clock
3.8 GHz vs 3.62 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9.2-A
-
33% larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 12 MB
-
Smaller process node
2 nm vs 3 nm
-
42% more GPU compute power
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 4952 GFLOPS
-
7% higher AnTuTu v11 score
29.29 Lakhs vs 27.27 Lakhs
-
32% faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,192 vs 7,704
-
10% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,843 vs 2,579
Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 leads
-
27% faster RAM
5333 MHz vs 4200 MHz
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+7% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+10% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+32% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- December 2025
- October 9, 2024
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- MediaTek
- Model Number
- Exynos 2600
- MT6991
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro
6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro - 1x 3.62 GHz - Cortex X925
3x 3.3 GHz - Cortex X4
4x 2.4 GHz - Cortex A720 - Max Frequency
- 3.8 GHz
- 3620 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.3
- ARMv9.2-A
- Process Node
- 2 nm
- 3 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- TSMC
- L2 Cache
- -
- 2 MB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 12 MB
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 960
- Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU
- GPU Frequency
- 985 MHz
- 1612 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 1536
- FLOPS
- 7024.6 GFLOPS
- 4952 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- 32K MAC NPU
- MediaTek NPU 890
- API Support
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4200 MHz
- 5333 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 67.2 GB/s
- 85.3 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.1
- UFS 4.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320 MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K at 120Hz
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1, AVC
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5410
- -
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 14.79 Gbps
- 7 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 4.90 Gbps
- 3.5 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 6.1
- 6.0
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 29,29,281
- 27,27,422
- CPU
- 9,56,605
- 8,49,678
- GPU
- 10,97,739
- 9,32,204
- Memory
- 4,24,610
- 3,52,736
- UX
- 4,50,327
- 5,92,804
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,843
- 2,579
- Multi-Core
- 10,192
- 7,704
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+5 pointsCPU Score
+4 pointsGPU Score
+13 pointsMemory Score
+4 pointsMore Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9400 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.