Mediatek Dimensity 9400 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
In this comparison, we take a closer look at two SoCs, Mediatek Dimensity 9400 vs Samsung Exynos 2400, based on their benchmarks and specifications. The Mediatek Dimensity 9400 comes with an octa-core CPU paired with an Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU, while the Samsung Exynos 2400 comes with a deca-core CPU and the Samsung Xclipse 940 GPU.
Why Mediatek Dimensity 9400 is better than Samsung Exynos 2400
- Geekbench 6 shows 28% faster single-core and 15% faster multi-core performance
- 34% higher AnTuTu score (2.70M vs 2.02M)
- 13% Faster CPU clock speed (3620 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- More advanced 3 nm process vs 4 nm
- 27% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 GB/s vs 67.2 GB/s)
- 45% higher compute power (4.95 TFLOPS vs 3.406 TFLOPS)
- 27% higher memory frequency (5333 MHz vs 4200 MHz)
- Released 9 months later - (October 9, 2024 vs January 2024)
Why Samsung Exynos 2400 is better than Mediatek Dimensity 9400
- Better multitasking with 10 cores compared to 8
Performance scores
CPU score
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
85
Samsung Exynos 2400
74
GPU score
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
86
Samsung Exynos 2400
74
Memory score
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
100
Samsung Exynos 2400
94
Total score
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
90
Samsung Exynos 2400
81
AnTuTu 10
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 +34%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
2,701,078
Samsung Exynos 2400
2,017,639
| CPU | 595,763 | 690,818 |
| GPU | 1,186,159 | 616,764 |
| MEM | 458,668 | 305,547 |
| UX | 460,488 | 404,510 |
| TOTAL | 2,701,078 | 2,017,639 |
Geekbench 6
Single-Core
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 +28%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
2,805
Samsung Exynos 2400
2,198
Multi-Core
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 +15%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
8,037
Samsung Exynos 2400
6,999
| Single-Core | 2,805 | 2,198 |
| Multi-Core | 8,037 | 6,999 |
General
| SoC Name | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| Launch Date | October 9, 2024 | January 2024 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model Number | MT6991 | S5E9945 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
CPU
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.62 GHz - Cortex X925 3x 3.3 GHz - Cortex X4 4x 2.4 GHz - Cortex A720 |
1x 3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Cores | 8 | 10 |
| Max Clock Speed | 3620 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| Architecture | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Process Node | 3 nm (N3E) | 4 nm |
| TDP | - | 6 W |
GPU
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU Architecture | 5th Gen Valhall Architecture | AMD RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 1009 MHz |
| Neural Processing Unit | MediaTek NPU 890 | Exynos AI Engine |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 768 |
| Compute Performance | 4.95 TFLOPS | 3.406 TFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| Max Refresh Rate | 180Hz (WQHD) | 144 Hz |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
Memory & Storage
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Frequency | 5333 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16-bit channels | 4 × 16-bit channels |
| Max Bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
ISP & Multimedia
| Max Camera | 320 MP | 1x 320 MP |
| Max Display Resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840 × 2400 px |
| Video Recording | 8K @ 60FPS, 4K @ 120FPS | 8K @ 30 fps, 4K @ 120 fps |
| Video Playback | 8K @ 60FPS, 4K @ 120FPS | 8K @ 60 fps, 4K @ 120 fps |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1, AVC | H.264, HEVC, H.265, VP9, AV1 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Integrated 5G Modem | Exynos 5300 Modem |
| 4G | Yes | Yes (LTE Cat. 20) |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Download Speed | Up to 7 Gbps | Up to 12.1 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | - | Up to 3.67 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |