MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Xring O1
Across 12 measured categories, the Xring O1 comes out ahead.
I put the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and the Xring O1 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU while the Xring O1 runs the Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
1 advantage
-
533 MHz higher RAM speed
5333 MHz vs 4800 MHz
Xring O1
6 advantages
-
9% higher AnTuTu score
29.63 Lakhs vs 27.27 Lakhs
-
18% faster Geekbench multi-core score
9,111 vs 7,704
-
3% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,660 vs 2,579
-
280 MHz higher CPU clock
3900 MHz vs 3620 MHz
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 12 MB
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
5701.6 GFLOPS vs 4952 GFLOPS
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and the Xring O1 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | October 9, 2024 | May 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | Xiaomi |
| Model Number | MT6991 | - |
| Total Cores | 8 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.62 GHz - Cortex X925 3x 3.3 GHz - Cortex X4 4x 2.4 GHz - Cortex A720 |
2x 3.90 GHz - Cortex-X925 4x 3.40 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.90 GHz - Cortex-A725 2x 1.80 GHz - Cortex-A520 |
| Max Frequency | 3620 MHz | 3900 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| GPU Name | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MP16 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 4952 GFLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | 44 TOPS |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 5333 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Camera Support | 320 MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1, AVC | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | - | MediaTek T800 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 7 Gbps | 7.90 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.5 Gbps | 4.20 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 27,27,422 | 29,63,052 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 8,49,678 | 9,37,172 |
| GPU | 9,32,204 | 9,96,086 |
| Memory | 3,52,736 | 4,09,648 |
| UX | 5,92,804 | 6,20,146 |
| Single-Core | 2,579 | 2,660 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 7,704 | 9,111 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Xring O1 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Apple A18 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
- 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- 3 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 4 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
- 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 6 Apple A16 Bionic vs Xring O1
- 7 Xring O1 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
- 8 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite
- 9 MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Xring O1
- 10 Apple A19 Pro vs Xring O1
Discussion