Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A19 Pro
In Geekbench, the Apple A19 Pro is 74% faster in single-core and 36% faster in multi-core. Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 does better: 64% more GPU compute power (4091.9 GFLOPS vs 2488.3 GFLOPS).
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A19 Pro: key differences
Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 leads
-
64% more GPU compute power
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 2488.3 GFLOPS
Where the Apple A19 Pro leads
-
29% higher peak CPU clock
4.26 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
-
2x larger L3 cache
32 MB vs 16 MB
-
36% faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,009 vs 7,361
-
74% faster in Geekbench single-core
3,879 vs 2,228
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
AnTuTu scores from iOS and Android are not directly comparable, so no winner is marked.
Geekbench Single-Core
+74% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+36% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- June 2025
- September 2025
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- Apple
- Model Number
- S5E9955
- T8150
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 6
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - 2x 4.26 GHz performance cores
4x 2.60 GHz efficiency cores - Max Frequency
- 3300 MHz
- 4260 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv9.2-A
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 3 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- TSMC
- L2 Cache
- 11 MB
- 16 MB (performance)
4 MB (efficiency) - L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 32 MB
- TDP
- 6 Watts
- -
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- Apple A19 pro (6-core GPU)
- GPU Frequency
- 999 MHz
- 1620 MHz
- Shading Units
- 64
- 128
- FLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- 2488.3 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- -
- Neural Engine
- API Support
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
- Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 4800 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x 16 Bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 75.8 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 12 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- NVMe
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320MP
- 48MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS
- 4K at 120FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1, VP8, VP9
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5400 5G
- Snapdragon (on Pro models), Apple C1X (on Air)
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 9.64 Gbps
- 10 Gbps (Snapdragon)
- Upload Speed
- 2.55 Gbps
- 3.5 Gbps (Snapdragon)
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 6.0
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NAVIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
AnTuTu scores from iOS and Android are not directly comparable, so no winner is marked.
- Total
- 21,54,825
- 20,06,613
- CPU
- 5,14,532
- 7,96,137
- GPU
- 9,46,368
- 6,02,282
- Memory
- 3,83,044
- 2,44,562
- UX
- 3,10,881
- 3,61,022
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,228
- 3,879
- Multi-Core
- 7,361
- 10,009
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+10 pointsCPU Score
+16 pointsGPU Score
+13 pointsMemory Score
More Exynos 2500 and Apple A19 Pro comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.