Apple A19 Pro vs Exynos 2600
Across 12 measured categories, the Exynos 2600 comes out ahead.
I put the Apple A19 Pro and the Exynos 2600 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Apple A19 Pro runs the Apple A19 pro (6-core GPU) while the Exynos 2600 runs the Samsung Xclipse 960. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Apple A19 Pro
4 advantages
-
36% faster Geekbench single-core score
3,879 vs 2,843
-
460 MHz higher CPU clock
4260 MHz vs 3.8 GHz
-
Larger L3 cache
32 MB vs 16 MB
-
600 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Exynos 2600
5 advantages
-
46% higher AnTuTu score
29.29 Lakhs vs 20.07 Lakhs
-
2% faster Geekbench multi-core score
10,192 vs 10,009
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.3 vs ARMv9.2-A
-
1 nm smaller semiconductor size
2 nm vs 3 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
7024.6 GFLOPS vs 2488.3 GFLOPS
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Apple A19 Pro and the Exynos 2600 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | September 2025 | December 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Apple | Samsung |
| Model Number | T8150 | Exynos 2600 |
| Total Cores | 6 | 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 2x 4.26 GHz performance cores 4x 2.60 GHz efficiency cores |
1x 3.8 GHz - Cortex-C1 Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro 6x 2.75 GHz - Cortex-C1 Pro |
| Max Frequency | 4260 MHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.3 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 2 nm |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB (performance) 4 MB (efficiency) |
- |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 16 MB |
| GPU Name | Apple A19 pro (6-core GPU) | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 1620 MHz | 985 MHz |
| Shading Units | 128 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 2488.3 GFLOPS | 7024.6 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | Yes |
| NPU | Neural Engine | 32K MAC NPU |
| API Support | Metal 3, Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0 | Vulkan 1.4, OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 75.8 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage Type | NVMe | UFS 4.1 |
| Camera Support | 48MP | 320 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K at 120Hz |
| Video Playback | 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1, VP8, VP9 | H.264, HEVC, H.265, AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, FLAC ,HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 |
| Modem | Snapdragon (on Pro models), Apple C1X (on Air) | Exynos 5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 10 Gbps (Snapdragon) | 14.79 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.5 Gbps (Snapdragon) | 4.90 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 6.1 |
| Navigation | NAVIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | - | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 20,06,613 | 29,29,281 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 7,96,137 | 9,56,605 |
| GPU | 6,02,282 | 10,97,739 |
| Memory | 2,44,562 | 4,24,610 |
| UX | 3,61,022 | 4,50,327 |
| Single-Core | 3,879 | 2,843 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 10,009 | 10,192 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Apple A19 Pro | Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Apple A19 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500
- 2 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Apple A19 Pro
- 3 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A19 Pro
- 4 Apple A19 Pro vs Apple A18 Pro
- 5 Apple A19 Pro vs Xring O1
- 6 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs Exynos 2600
- 7 Apple A18 Pro vs Exynos 2600
- 8 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
- 9 Xiaomi Xring O1 vs Exynos 2600
- 10 Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
Discussion