MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
The Samsung Exynos 2500 leads the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 by 9% on AnTuTu v11 (21.55 Lakhs vs 19.78 Lakhs) and is 40% faster in Geekbench single-core and 19% in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the MediaTek Dimensity 8400.
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500: key differences
Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 leads
-
2% higher peak CPU clock
3.3 GHz vs 3.25 GHz
-
2.7x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 6 MB
-
Smaller process node
3 nm vs 4nm
-
78% more GPU compute power
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 2300 GFLOPS
-
13% faster RAM
4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz
-
9% higher AnTuTu v11 score
21.55 Lakhs vs 19.78 Lakhs
-
19% faster in Geekbench multi-core
7,361 vs 6,179
-
40% faster in Geekbench single-core
2,228 vs 1,595
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+9% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+40% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+19% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- December 2024
- June 2025
- Chipset Class
- Upper Mid-range
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- MediaTek
- Samsung
- Model Number
- MT6899
- S5E9955
CPU
- Total Cores
- 8
- 10
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.25GHz - Cortex-A725
3x 3.0GHz - Cortex-A725
4x 2.1GHz - Cortex-A725 - 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - Max Frequency
- 3250 MHz
- 3300 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv9.2-A
- Process Node
- 4nm
- 3 nm
- Manufacturing
- TSMC
- Samsung
- L2 Cache
- 1MB
- 11 MB
- L3 Cache
- 6MB
- 16 MB
- TDP
- 7 W
- 6 Watts
GPU
- GPU Name
- Mali-G720 MP7 GPU
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- GPU Frequency
- 1300 MHz
- 999 MHz
- Shading Units
- 128
- 64
- FLOPS
- 2300 GFLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- MediaTek NPU 880
- -
- API Support
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4266 MHz
- 4800 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 68.2 GB/s
- 76.8 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 4.0
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320MP
- 320MP
- Video Capture
- 4K @ 60FPS
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- WQHD+
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 4K at 60FPS
- 8K at 30FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- -
- Exynos 5400 5G
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 5.17 Gbps
- 9.64 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 1.28 Gbps
- 2.55 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 6E
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 6.0
- 5.4
- Navigation
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 19,77,584
- 21,54,825
- CPU
- 6,20,628
- 5,14,532
- GPU
- 6,40,290
- 9,46,368
- Memory
- 2,82,939
- 3,83,044
- UX
- 4,33,737
- 3,10,881
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 1,595
- 2,228
- Multi-Core
- 6,179
- 7,361
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+10 pointsCPU Score
+15 pointsGPU Score
+9 pointsMemory Score
+5 pointsMore Dimensity 8400 and Exynos 2500 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.