Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
The Samsung Exynos 2500 scores 3.4x higher than the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 on AnTuTu v11 (21.55 Lakhs vs 6.27 Lakhs) and is 2.3x faster in Geekbench single-core and 3.4x in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the MediaTek Dimensity 7025.
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025: key differences
Where the Samsung Exynos 2500 leads
-
32% higher peak CPU clock
3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.2-A
-
4x larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
Smaller process node
3 nm vs 6 nm
-
16.8x more GPU compute power
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 243.2 GFLOPS
-
Newer RAM type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
50% faster RAM
4800 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
-
3.4x higher AnTuTu v11 score
21.55 Lakhs vs 6.27 Lakhs
-
3.4x faster in Geekbench multi-core
7,361 vs 2,156
-
2.3x faster in Geekbench single-core
2,228 vs 964
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
3.4x fasterGeekbench Single-Core
2.3x fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
3.4x fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- June 2025
- April 2024
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Mid-range
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- MediaTek
- Model Number
- S5E9955
- MT6855
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - 2× 2.5 GHz - Cortex-A78
6x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A55 - Max Frequency
- 3300 MHz
- 2500 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv8.2-A
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 6 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- TSMC
- L2 Cache
- 11 MB
- 1 MB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 4 MB
- TDP
- 6 Watts
- 5W
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- IMG BXM-8-256
- GPU Frequency
- 999 MHz
- 900 MHz
- Shading Units
- 64
- 18
- FLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- 243.2 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- No
- NPU
- -
- MediaTek NPU 550
- API Support
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
- Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 3200 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 2× 16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 25.6 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 16 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 3.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320MP
- 200 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 2K at 30 FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- Full HD+
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS
- 2K at 30 FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5400 5G
- -
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 9.64 Gbps
- 2.77 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 2.55 Gbps
- 1.25 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 5
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 5.2
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 21,54,825
- 6,26,826
- CPU
- 5,14,532
- 2,57,876
- GPU
- 9,46,368
- 59,950
- Memory
- 3,83,044
- 1,22,690
- UX
- 3,10,881
- 1,86,310
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,228
- 964
- Multi-Core
- 7,361
- 2,156
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+45 pointsCPU Score
+43 pointsGPU Score
+64 pointsMemory Score
+30 pointsMore Exynos 2500 and Dimensity 7025 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.