Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Across 12 measured categories, the Samsung Exynos 2500 comes out ahead.
I put the Samsung Exynos 2500 and the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Samsung Exynos 2500 runs the Samsung Xclipse 950 while the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 runs the IMG BXM-8-256. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Samsung Exynos 2500
11 advantages
-
244% higher AnTuTu score
21.55 Lakhs vs 6.27 Lakhs
-
241% faster Geekbench multi-core score
7,361 vs 2,156
-
131% faster Geekbench single-core score
2,228 vs 964
-
800 MHz higher CPU clock
3300 MHz vs 2500 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv8.2-A
-
Larger L3 cache
16 MB vs 4 MB
-
3 nm smaller semiconductor size
3 nm vs 6 nm
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
4091.9 GFLOPS vs 243.2 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,600 MHz higher RAM speed
4800 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
0 advantages
- No standout advantages for this chip.
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Samsung Exynos 2500 and the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | June 2025 | April 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Model Number | S5E9955 | MT6855 |
| Total Cores | 10 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925 2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725 5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725 2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 |
2× 2.5 GHz - Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz - Cortex-A55 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| L2 Cache | 11 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 6 Watts | 5W |
| GPU Name | Samsung Xclipse 950 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 999 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Shading Units | 64 | 18 |
| FLOPS | 4091.9 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | Yes | No |
| NPU | - | MediaTek NPU 550 |
| API Support | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 4800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x 16-bit | 2× 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Camera Support | 320MP | 200 MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30 FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | Full HD+ |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30FPS | 2K at 30 FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3 | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Exynos 5400 5G | - |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 9.64 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 2.55 Gbps | 1.25 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS | NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | Visit |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 21,54,825 | 6,26,826 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,14,532 | 2,57,876 |
| GPU | 9,46,368 | 59,950 |
| Memory | 3,83,044 | 1,22,690 |
| UX | 3,10,881 | 1,86,310 |
| Single-Core | 2,228 | 964 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 7,361 | 2,156 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Samsung Exynos 2500 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 2 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Google Tensor
- 3 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Mediatek Dimensity 7400
- 4 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
- 5 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
- 6 Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 7 Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 8 MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 9 Apple A19 Pro vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 10 Xring O1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Discussion