Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
The MediaTek Dimensity 9500 leads the Samsung Exynos 2500 by 63% on AnTuTu v11 (35.20 Lakhs vs 21.55 Lakhs) and is 57% faster in Geekbench single-core and 40% in multi-core. None of the key differences favour the Samsung Exynos 2500.
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500: key differences
Where the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 leads
-
28% higher peak CPU clock
4.21 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
-
Newer Arm instruction set
ARMv9.3-A vs ARMv9.2-A
-
29% more GPU compute power
5271.5 GFLOPS vs 4091.9 GFLOPS
-
11% faster RAM
5333 MHz vs 4800 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.1 vs UFS 4.0
-
63% higher AnTuTu v11 score
35.20 Lakhs vs 21.55 Lakhs
-
40% faster in Geekbench multi-core
10,280 vs 7,361
-
57% faster in Geekbench single-core
3,488 vs 2,228
AnTuTu and Geekbench scores
AnTuTu v11 Total
+63% fasterGeekbench Single-Core
+57% fasterGeekbench Multi-Core
+40% fasterFull specifications
Green marks the better value wherever one can be measured.
Overview
- Launch Date
- June 2025
- September 2025
- Chipset Class
- Flagship
- Flagship
- Manufacturer
- Samsung
- MediaTek
- Model Number
- S5E9955
- MT6993
CPU
- Total Cores
- 10
- 8
- Core Configuration
- 1x 3.3GHz - Cortex X925
2x 2.74GHz - Cortex A725
5x 2.36GHz - Cortex A725
2x 1.8GHz - Cortex A520 - 1x 4.21 GHz - C1-Ultra
3x 3.50 GHz - C1-Premium
4x 2.70 GHz - C1-Pro - Max Frequency
- 3300 MHz
- 4210 MHz
- Instruction Set
- ARMv9.2-A
- ARMv9.3-A
- Process Node
- 3 nm
- 3 nm
- Manufacturing
- Samsung
- TSMC
- L2 Cache
- 11 MB
- 2 MB
- L3 Cache
- 16 MB
- 16 MB
- TDP
- 6 Watts
- -
GPU
- GPU Name
- Samsung Xclipse 950
- Arm Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
- GPU Frequency
- 999 MHz
- 1716 MHz
- Shading Units
- 64
- 128
- FLOPS
- 4091.9 GFLOPS
- 5271.5 GFLOPS
- Ray Tracing Support
- Yes
- Yes
- NPU
- -
- MediaTek NPU 990
- API Support
- OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
- Vulkan 1.4, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0
Memory & Storage
- RAM Type
- LPDDR5X
- LPDDR5X
- RAM Frequency
- 4800 MHz
- 5333 MHz
- Memory Bus
- 4x 16-bit
- 4x16-bit
- Max Bandwidth
- 76.8 GB/s
- 85.3 GB/s
- Max RAM Size
- 24 GB
- 24 GB
- Storage Type
- UFS 4.0
- UFS 4.1
Camera & Display
- Camera Support
- 320MP
- 320 MP
- Video Capture
- 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Max Display Resolution
- 4K
- 4K
- Video Playback
- 8K at 30FPS
- 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- Video Codecs
- H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, AV1
- HEVC, AVC, VP9, AV1
- Audio Codecs
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, MP3
- AAC LC, FLAC, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, and MP3
Connectivity
- Modem
- Exynos 5400 5G
- -
- Network Support
- 5G
- 5G
- Download Speed
- 9.64 Gbps
- 10.7 Gbps
- Upload Speed
- 2.55 Gbps
- 3.5 Gbps
- Wi-Fi
- 7
- 7
- Bluetooth
- 5.4
- 6.0
- Navigation
- GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
- NavIC, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS
Links
Benchmark results
Every AnTuTu and Geekbench result for both chips. Green marks the higher score.
AnTuTu v11
- Total
- 21,54,825
- 35,19,907
- CPU
- 5,14,532
- 1,08,387
- GPU
- 9,46,368
- 13,61,440
- Memory
- 3,83,044
- 3,58,001
- UX
- 3,10,881
- 7,82,079
Geekbench
- Single-Core
- 2,228
- 3,488
- Multi-Core
- 7,361
- 10,280
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
Total Score
+11 pointsCPU Score
+16 pointsGPU Score
+13 pointsMemory Score
+5 pointsMore Exynos 2500 and Dimensity 9500 comparisons
Each chip against rivals with a similar overall score.
Discussion
No comments yet. Share what you think.