Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Google Tensor G4
Across 12 measured categories, the Google Tensor G4 comes out ahead.
I put the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Google Tensor G4 side by side to see how they really compare. On graphics, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 runs the Adreno 730 while the Google Tensor G4 runs the ARM Mali-G715 MP7. Below I go through the CPU, GPU, memory and connectivity, then the benchmark scores, so you can work out which one is the better fit for you.
Where each chip wins
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1 advantage
-
Larger L3 cache
6 MB vs 4 MB
Google Tensor G4
9 advantages
-
12% higher AnTuTu score
14.85 Lakhs vs 13.20 Lakhs
-
11% faster Geekbench multi-core score
4,581 vs 4,134
-
14% faster Geekbench single-core score
1,936 vs 1,704
-
100 MHz higher CPU clock
3100 MHz vs 3000 MHz
-
Newer CPU architecture
ARMv9.2-A vs ARMv9-A
-
Higher GPU FLOPS
1684.4 GFLOPS vs 1675 GFLOPS
-
Newer memory type
LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5
-
1,066 MHz higher RAM speed
4266 MHz vs 3200 MHz
-
Newer storage standard
UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
Benchmark charts
AnTuTu v11 Total
Geekbench Single-Core
Geekbench Multi-Core
Specifications Comparison
Here is how the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Google Tensor G4 compare across every spec. In each row, the stronger value is highlighted so the differences are easy to spot.
| Launch Date | December 2021 | August 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm | |
| Model Number | SM8450 | GS401 |
| Total Cores | 8 | 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Core Configuration | 1x 3 GHz - Cortex-X2 3x 2.5 GHz - Cortex-A710 4x 1.8 GHz - Cortex-A510 |
1x Cortex X4 - 3.1GHz 3x Cortex A720 - 2.6GHz 4x Cortex A520 - 1.95GHz |
| Max Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 4 MB |
| TDP | 5.3 W | 6 W |
| GPU Name | Adreno 730 | ARM Mali-G715 MP7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Frequency | 818 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1344 shaders |
| FLOPS | 1675 GFLOPS | 1684.4 GFLOPS |
| Ray Tracing Support | No | No |
| NPU | Hexagon NPU | Google Edge TPU |
| API Support | Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 | Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
|---|---|---|
| RAM Frequency | 3200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 4x16-bit | 4x 16-bit |
| Max Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
| Max RAM Size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Camera Support | 200 MP | 200MP |
|---|---|---|
| Video Capture | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Max Display Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Video Playback | 8K at 30 FPS, 4K at 120 FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video Codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9 |
| Audio Codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | Snapdragon X65 5G | Samsung Exynos 5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Network Support | 5G | 5G |
| Download Speed | 10 Gbps | 14.79 Gbps |
| Upload Speed | 3.67 Gbps | 3.87 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS |
| Official page | Visit | - |
|---|
Benchmark results
| Total | 13,20,406 | 14,85,111 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 5,01,429 | 5,20,100 |
| GPU | 2,09,242 | 4,16,199 |
| Memory | 2,36,547 | 2,32,401 |
| UX | 3,73,188 | 3,16,411 |
| Single-Core | 1,704 | 1,936 |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Core | 4,134 | 4,581 |
Overall Score
Each category scored out of 100.
| Category | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Score |
|
|
| GPU Score |
|
|
| Memory Score |
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
Related comparisons
- 1 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Apple A17 Pro
- 2 Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- 3 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Google Tensor G5
- 4 Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- 5 Apple A16 Bionic vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- 6 Google Tensor G5 vs Google Tensor G4
- 7 Google Tensor G4 vs Apple A15 Bionic
- 8 Mediatek Dimensity 7400 vs Google Tensor G4
- 9 Google Tensor G4 vs Google Tensor G2
- 10 Apple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G4
Discussion